Social Enterprise IncubatorIn partnership with Scale Collaborative, the Community Social Planning Council of Greater Victoria (a member of the Canadian CED Network) has launched a Social Enterprise Incubator. The incubator is designed to assist with the development of new social enterprises and is run by those who have successfully started multiple social enterprises and have coached others to achieve their own social and business goals.

This program is built to support success

FEATURING:

  • Mission-focused Business Planning
  • Intensive four-month workshop series
  • Three-month launch support
  • Guest speakers and expert advise
  • One-on-one coaching and mentorship
  • Access to extensive tools and resources 
  • Interactive peer learning environment

THE PLAN STARTS NOW:

  • July: Applications OPEN! See their website or email incubator at communitycouncil.ca for more details
  • August: Applications deadline August 19, 2016
  • August 26: 4-6 Applicants selected
  • September-November: Business Plan Development
  • January-March 2017: Launch Support & Coaching

WHO SHOULD APPLY?

  • Organizations who have a great social enterprise idea & want support to better define it
  • Those in a feasibility or early planning stage
  • Organizations who want to increase their internal capacity for developing social enterprises

Preference will be given to:

  • Vancouver Island non-profit and charitable organizations 
  • Enterprise concepts that create jobs for those facing barriers to employment 
  • Enterprises that employ youth (ages 16-30)

Note: Applicants who do not meet these criteria will also be considered

Apply now for the Social Enterprise Incubator

APPLICATION DEADLINE AUGUST 19, 2016

Questions? Contact:
Andrew Holeton, CED Program Manager
Community Social Planning Council of Greater Victoria
andrew at communitycouncil.ca  |  250-831-6166 x 109

Share

The Federal Government has launched a nation-wide call to action to help in the creation of an Inclusive Innovation Agenda. The federal department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development wants to hear your ideas around what they’ve identified as six key areas for action, the first of which includes the question “What more can be done to cement Canada’s place as a leader in social entrepreneurship?”.

The six areas for action are:

  1. Entrepreneurial and Creative Society
  2. Global Science Excellence
  3. World-Leading Clusters and Partnerships
  4. Grow Companies and Accelerate Clean Growth
  5. Compete in a Digital World
  6. Ease of Doing Business

The Canadian CED Network encourages submissions supporting community-led social innovation, such as social enterprises, co-operatives, social finance and community economic development initiatives. 

Please log in to the government’s consultation website and ‘like’ the ideas below or add your own.  It only takes a few minutes and will help demonstrate the demand for social innovation as part of Canada’s Innovation Agenda.  If you submit your own proposals, email us at communications at ccednet-rcdec.ca and we’ll promote them here. 

CCEDNet Proposals

  • Use Social Procurement and Community Benefit Agreements for Inclusive Growth
  • Create Tailored Investment Funds
  • Improve Access to Business Development Programs for Co-operatives and Non-profits
  • Modernize Regulations for Charities and Non-Profits Operating Businesses
  • Invest in an Enabling National Ecosystem for Social Innovation and Inclusive Growth
  • Facilitate Social Innovation Knowledge Transfer
  • Play a Greater Role in International Social Innovation Leadership

These recommendations were also presented in a letter CCEDNet sent to Hon. Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development.

CCEDNet Member Proposals

David LePage
  • Create a supportive environment for Social Enterprise
  • Include Social Purchasing Values in all government procurement and infrastructure
  • Leading the social purchasing strategy… cluster and partner with social values in business!
Vancouver Island Community Investment Cooperative; Laloca Fair Trade Social Enterprise
  • Enable Community Impact Investing
  • Invest in Community, NGO, Civil Society led partnerships
New Market Funds; Vancity; Renewal Funds; Tides Canada
Ecotrust Canada; Potluck Cafe; Climate Smart; The AMP; Ecotrust Canada Capital; the Binners Project
  • Support Nonprofit Social Entrepreneurs
Taina Maki Chahal; Rosalind Lockyer; Dr. Batia Stolar
  • Greater Inclusion
MaRS Centre for Impact Investing
Mike Gifford
  • Give a preference to Certified Benefit Corporations in government procurement
  • Accept Open by Default to Include Open Source Software
  • Leverage Micro Procurement like 18F
  • Give a preference in government procurement to open source software
  • Build Human Scale Procurement
  • Invest in Innovators not “Centres of Innovation
Momentum Community Economic Development Society
  • The Government of Canada can better support the development of social finance tools
  • Incorporate social screens in to public procurement decisions
  • Expand access to business services, such as the Canadian Business Network, for various organizational forms
  • Regulations can be updated to better encourage innovation, such as a social responsibility, among for-profit companies

Additional Resources:

  • News Release: Building an inclusive and innovative Canada
  • Biographies of Innovation Leaders
  • Speech: Launch of Innovation Agenda – Minister Bains
  • Speech: Launch of Innovation Agenda – Minister Duncan
  • Speech: Launch of Innovation Agenda – Minister Chagger
Share
Renewable energy can power Alberta communities

Renewable energy projects can be installed at community scale or micro-scale. Photo: David Dodge

Traditional power generation often takes the form of large generators far from the cities and towns that ultimately consume the electricity. Renewable power technology, on the other hand, is more flexible and has a range of possible applications in Alberta. Wind turbines and solar PV panels can be aggregated into large blocks that can be deployed quickly and replace traditional generators on the grid, with cost savings that exceed the best natural gas power plants. But as non-emitting facilities, renewables can also be placed closer to communities or on individual homes and businesses, with smaller-scale operations producing electricity in a distributed way right where its needed. Thanks to economies of scale, a utility-scale project can realize cost savings in the wires required to move electricity. However, community- and micro-scale generation projects can engender greater social benefits, like resilient decentralized supply and larger job benefits with 2.8 times more employment than larger-scale renewable-energy projects.

The size of community- and micro-scale generation projects possible with renewable generation also allow Albertans to participate in power generation in way that is not possible with traditional generation. Citizens and businesses can take ownership or invest directly in projects and realize the returns. That means more money flows back to the community instead of leaving our province. These projects build capacity for further community economic development by retaining capital, training local workers and inspiring entrepreneurship — all ingredients for a sustainable and vibrant Alberta economy.

A combination of utility, community and micro-scale renewable energy projects in Alberta can deliver the maximum benefits to the province as it works towards the goal of 30 per cent renewable generation by 2030.

The Microgeneration Regulation governs how Alberta residents and businesses can generate their own electricity and sell this power to the grid. The regulation expires at the end of the year, and a refreshed set of rules will shape the way we invest in, produce and use energy from renewables. Community energy projects will be supported by carbon-levy revenue through Energy Efficiency Alberta, a newly created agency.

Albertans are being asked to provide input on both the regulation and carbon-levy support. Energy-industry stakeholders have until July 10 to submit feedback, and a roundtable discussion is set for the end of the month. Meanwhile, all Albertans are invited to comment on support for community energy via the Energy Efficiency Advisory Panel website.

Options for microgeneration and community-scale energy

Starland Community Solar

The Starland Country Community Solar Program 
provides electricity to farmers in Alberta.
Photo: David Dodge, Green Energy Futures

Local generation includes microgeneration, where individuals produce renewable energy at the point of consumption, such as on top of a home or business, as well as community-scale energy, where multiple citizens and businesses can support a grid-connected project in their community by investing in it or sharing in the benefits.

Microgeneration and community-scale energy can be done in many ways. Around the world, there are examples of rooftop solar, community co-operatives, limited partnerships and businesses with options for community shares, utility and retailer options, investment funds, and public-private projects led by municipalities. Removing key roadblocks — such as microgeneration size constrained to the meter load — will allow Albertans to choose the best model and technology for their particular situation.

Rooftop solar: Homes and businesses can put solar panels on their own roof. They can purchase the panels outright, or companies like SolarCity provide options that include loans and leases — a model that has unlocked solar in the U.S. residential market, which has seen nearly 10-fold growth since 2011.

Community co-operatives, limited partnerships and businesses: A group of citizens can pool community capital for a project and offer shares or bonds, creating a leverage point for further institutional lending and project developer equity while building energy literacy and capacity. Community members can invest in a limited partnership or business set up by a developer with some or all of the project’s shares set aside for community members, which requires less community co-ordination and volunteer hours.

Utility and retailer options: Local energy utilities or energy retail companies in competitive markets can deliver community-scale energy by using virtual net metering (VNM). Utilities in Colorado, Massachusetts and California — to name a few markets — all successfully use VNM to allow customers to invest in community-scale energy projects. This approach uses existing customer bills to credit a part of production from a community-scale energy project to their bill. Without moving around electricity metres, or adding up customer loads, customers can help invest in a project via their retailer or local energy utility company, opening up opportunities for those who don’t have a suitable rooftop. Multi-unit residential buildings can also use VNM to share production from a single system without complicated rewiring of electricity metres.

Investment funds: Community energy can offer an alternative to the stock market with a local renewable-energy investment opportunity that puts returns into Albertans’ pockets. Nova Scotia’s Community Economic Development Investment Funds (CEDIF) give local citizens an easy way to invest in renewables with Tax-Free Savings Accounts and RRSP-eligible options and a 35 per cent tax credit when you hold on to the investment for several years.

Public-private projects: Municipalities, universities, schools and hospitals (the MUSH sector) are public institutions that can take a leadership role. By investing in community energy, they help establish a local renewable-energy industry and investment options for citizens and business, as well as deliver the benefits of renewables to the citizens they serve.

Different models will work best for different situations and there is no need for a one size fits all solution. By enabling different options for community-scale energy and microgeneration we can deliver maximum opportunities and benefits for all Albertans. 

Originally published July 7, 2016 on the Pembina Institute’s blog


Barend Dronkers

Barend Dronkers is a consultant who works on corporate, government and community-based sustainability projects. He’s based in Calgary.

Sara Hastings-Simon

Sara Hastings-Simon is an expert on the clean economy and works with the Pembina Institute in Calgary

 

Share

Parliament of CanadaThe Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities has launched a study of poverty reduction strategies.

The study focuses on improving the delivery of federal resources and services for the Canadian Poverty Reduction Strategy and is based on four main areas:

  1. Housing: studying affordable housing, housing strategies, homelessness, and Housing First initiatives, and other new and or innovative approaches;
  2. Education and Training: studying school based poverty reduction strategies, access to higher education, skills training/re-training, English as a Second Language/French as a Second Language (ESL/FSL), apprenticeship, financial literacy, and other new and or innovative approaches;
  3. Government administered savings and entitlement programs: studying Registered Education Savings Plans (RESPs), Registered Disability Savings Plans (RDSPs), Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs), Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs), Canada Pension Plan (CPP), Old Age Security (OAS) and Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS), studying the Seniors Price Index and Consumer Price Index as they relate to these programs, and other new and or innovative approaches;
  4. Neighbourhoods: studying urban planning, infrastructure building as a poverty reduction strategy, accessible and affordable transit, community support networks, and other new and or innovative approaches.

Within these areas the Committee emphasizes studying vulnerable communities and exploring the impact of gender on poverty and poverty reduction strategies in Canada.

Finally, the study pays close attention and focuses on innovation in poverty reduction through collaboration between levels of government (federal, provincial or territorial, and municipal), social innovation, private sector and non-profit initiatives, and social financing.

Organizations and individuals who wish to appear before the Committee can submit a request to appear and indicate which subject area they would like to address.

Submit a request to appear before the Committee

Briefs of no more than 2,000 words, including an executive summary can also be submitted to the Committee.

Submit a brief to the Committee

SOURCE: The Parliament of Canada

Share

National Call For Project Ideas: This Place MattersThe National Trust for Canada invites community groups undertaking main street projects to participate in a national crowdfunding competition this fall. The 2016 This Place Matters competition will give community groups the chance to raise funds, reach new audiences and compete for two $40,000 prizes. The National Trust is seeking local groups with project ideas that will contribute to the vitality of a traditional main street and enhance community pride.

“Canada’s traditional main streets have enormous potential,” said Natalie Bull, Executive Director of the National Trust. “Main street is where people, art and culture converge and where Canada’s small businesses thrive. The 2016 This Place Matters competition will bring community partners and young people together to revitalize their main streets with projects that generate economic, social, cultural or environmental benefits for their communities.”

About the Competition

This Place Matters empowers Canadians to be involved in the renewal of Canada’s great places. During the 2016 competition, participating project groups will attract votes, raise awareness and have a chance to win cash prizes to implement their project.

Eligible project groups will compete in two categories:

  • Populations below 50,000 – Town Spotlight
  • Populations over 50,000 – City Beacon

A winner will be declared in each category based on the number of votes received. Both winning projects will be awarded a cash prize of $40,000. Voting will be free and open to the public.  Project groups will also receive one (1) additional vote for every dollar they raise through crowdfunding.

The competition will run from October 4, 2016 to November 15, 2016.

Read the complete rules and regulations

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible project groups competing on This Place Matters must demonstrate that their project meets one or more of the following key objectives:

  • Protecting Places: Improving the physical environment of the main street (e.g. the renewal of a public building or space).
  • Making Connections: Connecting the community and visitors to the history, heritage and cultural diversity of a place (e.g. an app describing local heritage attractions).
  • Celebrating Community: Bringing people together to rediscover and celebrate local identity (e.g. hosting an event celebrating local cuisine).

In addition, the project must be in a position to start within 12 months of the end of the competition.

Review the complete eligibility criteria

Register Your Project

To participate in the 2016 This Place Matters competition, groups must register their projects. Registered projects will be assessed by a jury to ensure compliance with the eligibility criteria.

Register your project now

Projects must be registered by Tuesday, August 30, 2016. Participating projects will be announced September 23, 2016.


About This Place Matters

The National Trust for Canada’s This Place Matters is Canada’s only crowdfunding platform dedicated to heritage places. Since its launch in 2015,This Place Matters has directed over $375,000 to worthy heritage projects thanks to contributions from Canadians across the country and from the National Trust’s sponsors and partners.

The National Trust for Canada thanks its Founding Partner, the RBC Foundation, for its support.

Questions? Contact thisplacematters at nationaltrustcanada.ca or phone 1-866-964-1066.

Share

Forum of Labour Market Ministries

Labour market transfer agreements support the design and delivery of provincial-territorial programs and services that respond to the employment needs of all Canadian workers, including persons with disabilities, older workers, low-skilled workers, youth, other underrepresented groups, and employers.

To ensure these agreements continue to be relevant, flexible and responsive to current and emerging labour market needs and priorities, federal, provincial and territorial Labour Market Ministers announced on June 28, 2016 (see June 28, 2016 Communique) the launch of broad-based consultations over the summer months to gather stakeholder perspectives and inform future investments in employment and skills training programs and services.

Governments will be consulting broadly with stakeholders, including organizations representing employers, jobseekers, service providers, underrepresented groups, postsecondary and training institutions, think tanks, and individuals. In July and August 2016, federal, provincial and territorial governments will lead a series of roundtables and will invite stakeholders to share their views on how labour market transfer agreements can better support Canada’s labour markets’ needs. Federal, provincial and territorial governments will also undertake their own consultations with additional stakeholders.

To guide the consultations, the FLMM has developed a discussion paper on the changing economic and labour market context in Canada, current labour market transfer agreements, and key discussion themes for the consultations. The paper also includes a series of questions for stakeholders’ considerations.

Stakeholders are also invited to submit their views using the discussion paper by August 19th, 2016 through the FLMM Secretariat (fmmt.flmm at mess.gouv.qc.ca).

Fore more information, questions or general inquiries on the pan-Canadian consultations, please contact the FLMM Secretariat (fmmt.flmm at mess.gouv.qc.ca).

Source: The Forum of Labour Market Ministers

Share

Service CanadaEmployment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) is currently accepting proposals from organizations interested in receiving financial assistance from the Skills Link program.

Project activities can be provincial or territorial or local in scope. Activities must be confined to one province or territory.

The Skills Link program is a component of the Government of Canada’s Youth Employment Strategy (YES). Through funding for organizations, the Skills Link program helps youth overcome barriers to employment, develop a broad range of skills and knowledge in order to participate in the current and future labour market and to promote education and skills as being key to labour market participation. These barriers include, but are not limited to, challenges faced by recent immigrant youth, youth with disabilities, single parent youth, youth who have not completed high school, Indigenous youth, and youth living in rural or remote areas.

Apply for Skills Link funding now

Deadline: August 12, 2016 at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time

There are 2 (two) streams for this Call for Proposals.

When possible, submit only one proposal (per stream) and that can include multiple activities in the same province or territory.

Stream One will prioritize and will award additional points to projects that focus on the following program priorities highlighted by this Call for Proposals:

  • Projects that target green jobs
  • Projects that incorporate Essential Skills
  • Projects that target female at–risk youth
  • Projects that target Indigenous youth
  • Projects that fill high demand labour market needs that are currently met through the use of Temporary Foreign Workers
  • Applicants that leverage a minimum of 20% of funding from other sources
  • Projects that facilitate youth mobility to access employment opportunities

Stream Two will focus on projects that demonstrate Social Innovation, more specifically, but not exclusively:

  • Testing innovative approaches
  • Social enterprise

Please note that Stream Two proposals can include some or all components of Stream One, however, Stream Two projects will be set apart by the Social Innovation Component included in the project that is utilized to reach the expected results of the Skills Link program.

Source: Service Canada

Share

Home Sweet HomeHome Sweet Home, a local foods grocery store turned economic development project, is travelling the province this month, teaching rural communities how to build their local food economies. Between now and July 27, the Home Sweet Home Field School will be visiting Revelstoke, Burns Lake, Terrace, Hazelton and Telkwa, delivering free workshops on a range of food-business related topics, from business development to local policy.

Home Sweet Home was started by Diandra Oliver and Laura Sapergia in Prince George 3 years ago as a small grocery store, specializing in local food products at an accessible price. As they grew into a successful business, they found their customers wanted more than locally-produced groceries, they were also looking for advice.

“We were surprised by how many people would ask us questions about how they could start their own local food business,” says Oliver. “Some people wanted to know what grew well in our community and what they could sell. Others were interested in how they could develop value-added food products into a market ready item. Our storefront quickly evolved into a community space where people could support a local economic initiative and gain skills and knowledge to be more active in that economy themselves.”

In response, the Home Sweet Home duo began to expand their vision from one successful grocery store to an economic development project supporting local food businesses and their communities, to strengthen the local food sector.

“Home Sweet Home is an incredibly successful example of the potential of the local food economy in rural British Columbia,” says Sapergia. “What communities lack is knowledge. People want to know what works or what is legal and food safe or how to connect with customers. Communities want to know how they can encourage more local food producers. We want to help find solutions.”

Sapergia and Oliver launched the Home Sweet Home Field School and with some seed funding from SFU’s Community Economic Development Program’s annual Social Innovation Challenge, are touring the Interior and Northern B.C.

“Diandra pitched the Home Sweet Home Field School for our annual Social Innovation Challenge,” says SFU CED Program Director, Nicole Chaland. “Her passion is infectious, her vision for how to create sustainable and strong economies in the North is well reasoned and she has proven her capability with Home Sweet Home. We are thrilled to support her and her business partner to do this work.”

All Home Sweet Home Field School workshops are FREE and everyone is welcome to register online at www.beawesomeitseasy.com

Wednesday, July 20th at Burns Lake
Thursday, July 21st at Terrace
Monday, July 25th at Hazelton
Tuesday, July 26th at Hazelton
Wednesday, July 27th at Telkwa

Media Contact:

Diandra Oliver
ohsweetie at gmail.com
250-562-0988

Share

'Reading and relaxing' by Will Ockenden If you’re like Canadian CED Network Executive Director, Michael Toye, you have a pile of books on the side of your desk (see image below right) to remind you of how much you would like to read, if ever you get enough time. Many of us see the few weeks of summer vacation we may have as the prime opportunity to set high expectations for the reading we’d like to accomplish.

Building on last year’s blog post, we again asked staff and board members what they were planning on reading this summer, both vocationally and ‘vacationally’.

Below is what we have compiled and it provides a great window into the personalities and interests of those involved in the daily operations of CCEDNet and those involved in providing the oversight and vision building of CCEDNet’s work.

But more than that, we hope you might be intrigued by some of the titles below, and we hope you’ll share what you’re reading.  

Share your summer reading suggestions with us on Facebook or Twitter.

Click on the names below or scroll down to read the suggestions.


Sarah Lesson-Klym

Truth and Reconciliation Commission
by The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada

This body of work is essential reading for all Canadians, but particularly those of us who work in fields where we are often working alongside or on behalf of Indigenous peoples. It will be a hard look at our collective history, but will provide context, evidence, and motivation for how we can build a new and better relationship with Indigenous communities that supports equity and an economy that is for all of us, forever.

Deepening Community
by Paul Born

This is a newer piece from the leader of Tamarack, and I’m looking forward to learning more about his understanding of community in a modern, global age and how we can deepen our sense of this key component of our work. I’m especially interested in his first pillar of deep community, focusing on how sharing our stories. I’m hoping to see ways to share diverse stories and build a more rich, nuanced, and truthful understanding of my own community.

Pilgrim at Tinker Creek
by Annie Dillard

This is technically called fiction, but more of a rumination on the way we are rooted in our place and landscape. I’ve read it many times before and want to revisit it because she pulls us towards a slower, calmer observation of the world around us. This slowed down way of life is appealing while the world seems to spin ever faster around me.

More about Sarah Leeson-Klym top ^

Laurie Cook

Why David Sometimes Wins

Why David Sometimes Wins
by Marshall Ganz

It’s about leadership, organization and strategy in the California Farm Worker’s Movement in the 60’s.  Marshall Ganz is currently a professor of sociology at Harvard, but he used to be right in there as an organizer in the 60’s. One of the best books I’ve ever read about organizing.  Excellent balance of theory, practice and story.

More about Laurie Cook top ^

Yvon Poirier 

The life and times of Raúl Prebisch
by Edgar J. Dosman

This biography of this Argentinian economist, prepared by a Canadian is quite interesting about the history of development and in the world. He was the founder of UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), some 40 years ago.  In explained well that the traditional economics theory of comparative advantage (countries specialise on what they do best and then export these goods to import from others) is a flawed theory and that for countries in the periphery, they lose out. Like Argentina which was specialised on producing beef to sell to the UK. And there was little manufacturing.

Raúl Prebisch was a leader in economic development theory and international economic policy, an institution builder, and an international diplomat. The Life and Times of Raúl Prebisch provides the first book-length account of his life and work, a story cast against the backdrop of Latin America, the Cold War, the rise of the United Nations, and the struggle for equity between first and third worlds.

More about Yvon Poirier top ^

Frank Atnikov

The End of Fundraising: Raise More Money by Selling Your Impact 
by Jason Saul 

Why does it cost nonprofits on average $20 to raise $100, while it costs companies only $4? Simply put: Nonprofits have no leverage. No one has to make a donation. And since most donors have no direct stake in the organizations they support, they make donations out of the goodness of their hearts. If donors feel like writing a check, they will. If they don’t, they won’t. The End of Fundraising turns fundraising on its head, teaching nonprofits how to stop begging for charity and start selling impact. For the first time, nonprofits have economic power. We live in a new era where consumers, businesses, investors, employees, and service providers attach real economic value to social outcomes. An era where yesterday’s “feel good” issues—education, the environment, health care, the arts, and animal rights—now have direct economic consequences and opportunities. Nonprofits now have leverage. To use this leverage, nonprofits must learn how to “sell” their impact to a new set of stakeholders.

The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing: Violate Them at Your Own Risk
by by Al Ries (Author), Jack Trout 

Ries and Trout, authors of some of the most popular titles in marketing published during the last decade ( Marketing Warfare , LJ 10/15/85; Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind , Warner, 1987; and Bottom-Up Marketing , McGraw, 1989), continue the same breezy style, with lots of anecdotes and insider views of contemporary marketing strategy. The premise behind this book is that in order for marketing strategies to work, they must be in tune with some quintessential force in the marketplace. Just as the laws of physics define the workings of the universe, so do successful marketing programs conform to the “22 Laws.” Each law is presented with illustrations of how it works based on actual companies and their marketing strategies. For example, the “Law of Focus” states that the most powerful concept in marketing is “owning” a word in the prospect’s mind, such as Crest’s owning cavities and Nordstrom’s owning service. The book is fun to read, contains solid information, and should be acquired by all public and business school libraries. It will be requested by readers of the authors’ earlier titles.

The Hundred-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out of the Window and Disappeared
by Jonas Jonasson, Rod Bradbury (Translator)

It all starts on the one-hundredth birthday of Allan Karlsson. Sitting quietly in his room in an old people’s home, he is waiting for the party he-never-wanted-anyway to begin. The Mayor is going to be there. The press is going to be there. But, as it turns out, Allan is not… Slowly but surely Allan climbs out of his bedroom window, into the flowerbed (in his slippers) and makes his getaway. And so begins his picaresque and unlikely journey involving criminals, several murders, a suitcase full of cash, and incompetent police. As his escapades unfold, we learn something of Allan’s earlier life in which – remarkably – he helped to make the atom bomb, became friends with American presidents, Russian tyrants, and Chinese leaders, and was a participant behind the scenes in many key events of the twentieth century. Already a huge bestseller across Europe, The Hundred-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out of the Window and Disappeared is a fun and feel-good book for all ages. 

More about Frank Atnikov top ^

Wendy Keats

Renewable Energy:  Power for a Sustainable Future
by Godfrey Boyle

The provision of sustainable energy supplies for an expanding and increasingly productive world is one of the major issues facing civilisation today. Renewable Energy examines both the practical and economic potential of the renewable energy sources to meet this challenge. The underlying physical and technological principles behind deriving power from direct solar (solar thermal and photovoltaics), indirect solar (biomass, hydro, wind and wave) and non-solar (tidal and geothermal) energy sources are explained, within the context of their environmental impacts, their economics and their future prospects. Together with its companion volume, Energy Systems and Sustainability, this book provides both perspective and detail on the relative merits and state of progress of technologies for utilizing the various ‘renewables’.

The Illegal
by Lawrence Hill

All Keita has ever wanted to do is to run. Running means respect and wealth at home. His native Zantoroland, a fictionalized country whose tyrants are eerily familiar, turns out the fastest marathoners on earth. But after his journalist father is killed for his outspoken political views, Keita must flee to the wealthy nation of Freedom State—a country engaged in a crackdown on all undocumented people.

There, Keita becomes a part of the new underground. He learns what it means to live as an illegal: surfacing to earn cash prizes by running local races and assessing whether the people he meets will be kind or turn him in. As the authorities seek to arrest Keita, he strives to elude capture and ransom his sister, who has been kidnapped.

Off Grid East Coast
Magazine

This new magazine showcases real people in Atlantic Canada doing real things to reduce their carbon footprint.  It tells stories about innovation community-led initiatives and has articles about everything from solar to biomass, micro hydro,  tiny houses, permaculture, edible wild food and much more!

There, Keita becomes a part of the new underground. He learns what it means to live as an illegal: surfacing to earn cash prizes by running local races and assessing whether the people he meets will be kind or turn him in. As the authorities seek to arrest Keita, he strives to elude capture and ransom his sister, who has been kidnapped.

More about Wendy Keats top ^

Marianne Jurzyniec

Seed Sovereignty, Food Security: Women in the Vanguard of the Fight against GMOs and Corporate AgricultureSeed Sovereignty, Food Security: Women in the Vanguard of the Fight against GMOs and Corporate Agriculture
by Vandana Shiva

It isn’t easy to navigate and participate in the complex world that is our food systems in an ethical and sustainable way. Each year I try to read at least one book that sheds some light on this area. This year I’ve chosen Seed Sovereignty, Food Security a collection of work from women around the world writing about the movement to change the current, industrial paradigm of how we grow our food. As seed keepers and food producers, as scientists, activists, and scholars, they are dedicated to renewing a food system that is better aligned with ecological processes as well as human health and global social justice.

The End of Protest: A New Playbook for Revolution
by Micah White

Having felt the same frustrations watching social movements mobilize large sectors of our society but with minimal change made me add this book to my summer reading list. Micah White, co-creator of Occupy Wall Street, believes our current approach to activism is itself in need of a revolution and offers new scenarios for how to approach social change.

More about Marianne Jurzyniec top ^

Tom Jakop

Promoting Global Justice and Citizens' Engagement in a Time of Uncertainty - Youth ReportPromoting Global Justice and Citizens’ Engagement in a Time of Uncertainty – Youth Report
by Challenging the Crises 

The EU member states have been badly affected by the 2008 economic crisis, with some countries finding it particularly challenging to respond and recover. In times of austerity it is easy to focus on the crisis at home and not consider wider global issues. To investigate whether this is the case among young people in the most indebted EU countries, the Challenging the Crisis partners conducted research to assess their level of engagement with issues of global citizenship and global justice.

This report outlines the views of young people, aged 15 – 34 from Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, Spain and Slovenia, on international development, and their understanding of related concepts and issues. The aim of the research is to assess whether global solidarity and development aid are priorities for European youth in a time of economic and political crisis and high unemployment.

Social Inclusion and Young People Social Inclusion and Young People  (EXCLUDING youth : a threat to our future)
by YouthForum.org

This report will examine the social situation of youth and assess the quality of social policies and social protection and services available to young people. It will demonstrate gaps in the current functioning of welfare systems in Europe that need to be addressed. It will show that the European social model has to adapt to a changed social and economic context, to guarantee investment in the young generation through education, creation of quality jobs, social protection, healthcare and housing support. This has to happen not only to ensure the respect of social rights of young people today, but also to safeguard the well-being of European society, both for today and for tomorrow.

More about Tom Jakop top ^

Michael Toye

Truth and Reconciliation Commission
by The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada

We are all treaty people.  Reconciliation is essential if we hope to move towards right relationships.  This will no doubt be a tough read, but we have to take responsibility for what the Canadian government did in the name of Canadians, before we can really move forward. 

Profound Changes in Economics Have Made Left vs. Right Debates Irrelevant
by Eric Beinhocker

The headline of this article is a bit misleading; I doubt that left vs right debates will become irrelevant.  But its key argument — that orthodox economics is finally moving towards methods that are a better reflection of reality — offers huge opportunities for community economic development.  An interdisciplinary approach that draws on complex systems studies and network theory, and jettisons many damaging and unrealistic assumptions is much more aligned with the community level innovation that CCEDNet members have been leading for decades.  Hurry up, new economics.  

Tribe: On Homecoming and Belonging
by Sebastian Junger

I heard an interview with Sebastian Junger on the radio, and it struck me that the stories in this book are moving testimony on the power of community.  If we can better understand the evolutionary psychology behind our social and communal instincts, we’ll have a much better foundation and design premise for community economic development

More about Michael Toye top ^

Matthew Thompson

Year of the Flood
by Margaret Atwood

I loved reading Oryx and Crake and have been meaning to read this second book in the MaddAddam trilogy. I have all the more reason to do so now that I understand that HBO is producing a TV series based on the books directed by Darren Aronofsky. In this speculative fiction series Atwood explores a dystopic future reeling from the consequences (climate change, disease epidemics, addictions, mass marginalization, etc.) of short-sighted science as employed by globalized economics.  

After Occupy: Economic Democracy for the 21st CenturyAfter Occupy: Economic Democracy for the 21st Century
by Tom Malleson

Anyone who claims that the Occupy movement has failed to make a significant impact hasn’t been paying attenetion to the political language of today. Without Occupy I don’t think we would be seeing the rogue popularity of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump in the current United States presidential election, both of whom have been very deliberate in their appeal to the working class (in a country whose politicans have long denied class as a major issue). I have had Malleson’s book on my ‘to read list’ ever since I attended a workshop of his at the Peoples Social Forum in Ottawa last year. In this book he argues that we need to not just focus on extending democratic principles in our political arenas but in our economic lives as well, principally through collective ownership and shared decision making. 

More about Matthew Thompson top ^
Share

right to housingCanada has not had a national housing plan since the mid-1990s. In the intervening years, the housing market has all but been restructured. We’ve all heard about the condo bubbles in Toronto and Vancouver, and the $1- million, 800-square-foot single detached houses in Vancouver. Young adults can’t afford mortgages — at least without major backing from their parents — making home ownership the intergenerational privilege of a shrinking middle class.

Stories of mini-mansions, teardowns and the middle-class squeeze are only part of the housing story, however. What the scandalous stories of million- dollar shacks in Vancouver miss is the pressure on rental housing. Renters are feeling the pinch differently, depending on the area and apartment type they live in, but they are all feeling it. In Winnipeg, rental rates have gone up by an overall average of more than 3.5 per cent in both 2014 and 2015, outpacing inflation. This upward pressure means more people are paying more than the affordability guideline of 30 per cent of their income on rent.

For people who have a very low income, the situation is perilous. For one thing, until this year, the easing of vacancy rates we’ve seen in Winnipeg in the past couple of years was largely happening at the high end of the market, rather than the lower. Vacancy rates vary by neighbourhood, but units renting at less than $500 a month (a rare find, and one the quality of which might be questionable at best) have tended to have low vacancy rates, making these units tough to come by. Even as vacancies have eased for some apartment types, affordability is evaporating.

Keep in mind $500 is in the “affordability zone” for around 13 per cent of Winnipeg households (2010 census data). Yet the average rent for a bachelor apartment in the core area is $589, with some differences between core area neighbourhoods ($431 in Lord Selkirk versus $600 in Centennial, according to a Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. report in 2015). This is the average rent for a bachelor. The hard, if obvious, truth is most people living on low incomes end up paying more of their overall income — a lot more.

That’s where housing advocates, including non-profit housing providers of affordable and social housing, come in — or should come in. But the truth is, providers of non-profit housing are pinched, too. At affordable rates, these providers are not covering costs, and many are coming to the end of operating agreements that date back to before the 1990s. The result has been increased pressure to phase out rent-geared-to-income units in favour of affordable units that are no longer affordable to people with no other options. In addition, housing providers report frequent and expensive apartment turnovers, making their operating costs high. Tenants struggling to pay rent and put food on the table, unsurprisingly, can require on-site social supports. Where the work of social services ends, non-profit providers — often their on-site managers and caretakers — find their work unwittingly begins. Any de facto social work and emergency services is an added cost.

Despite the pinch of housing providers, in the past 20 or so years where the federal government has ignored housing (as best it could, anyway), provinces and housing advocates have filled the void. For their part, advocates across the country have managed to create a network of ground- level analysts and providers who can explain supply issues and affordability issues as they affect housing accessibility and cost. Likewise, they can speak to the interconnected social and housing needs of a specific population, such as low-income, indigenous, newcomer and seniors. Manitoba advocate group Right to Housing has examined, among other things, the effects of taxation and incentives on supply across the housing continuum.

These advocate groups, which include the Canadian Housing and Renewal Association on a national level, have called on the federal government to save us a seat at the table for discussions about a new national housing strategy. Federal and provincial governments have taken the important first step to formulate a strategy to address the new reality in Canada and advocacy groups want to be part of that process.


Tyler PearceTyler Pearce is chairwoman of Right to Housing’s federal working group. Find out more about right to housing at righttohousing.ca.

Share

House of CommonsThe House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance has launched its pre-budget consultation process, and is inviting the participation of Canadians. A report on the consultations will be tabled in the House of Commons in December 2016. The suggestions made by Canadians, and the report on the pre-budget consultations prepared by the Committee, will be considered by the Minister of Finance as the 2017 federal budget is developed.

CCEDNet’s National Policy Council will be preparing recommendations based on our policy priorities.  Last year’s recommendations can be found here

Visit the study’s webpage to submit a brief or to make a request to appear before the Committee. 

The deadline for written submissions to the Committee is no later than Friday, 5 August 2016 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. Submissions should be no longer than 2,000 words, including an executive summary. Submissions exceeding this limit will not be considered by the Committee. Following translation, the submissions will be circulated to Committee members and posted on the Committee’s website.

The focus of written submissions to the Committee and appearances in fall 2016 should be the following:

  1. What federal measures would help Canadians generally – and such specific groups as the unemployed, Indigenous peoples, those with a disability and seniors – maximize, in the manner of their choosing, their contributions to the country’s economic growth?
    • For example, what measures in relation to education and training, labour mobility, workplace accommodation, labour market information and personal taxes would be most helpful in supporting the country’s economic growth?
  1. What federal actions would assist Canada’s businesses – in all regions and sectors – meet their expansion, innovation and prosperity goals, and thereby contribute to economic growth in the country?
    • For example, what actions in relation to support for entrepreneurs, internal and international trade and investment, regional development agencies, taxation and business financing would help businesses maximize their contribution to Canada’s economic growth?
  1. What federal measures would ensure that urban, rural and remote communities throughout Canada enable residents to make their desired contribution to the country’s economic growth and businesses to expand, prosper and serve domestic and international customers in order to contribute to growth?
    • For example, what measures in relation to broadband and other types of infrastructure, arts, recreation, tourism and climate change adaptation would help communities to support residents and businesses as they seek to take advantage of opportunities and contribute to the nation’s economic growth?

Share

lets talk housing

On June 28, the federal government announced its long awaited consultation process on the development of a National Housing Strategy. The government is looking for your input now. CCEDNet members have been calling for the development of a national housing strategy for many years.

The consultation will take place in two phases.  The first phase will involve establishing high level outcomes and objectives for a National Housing Strategy.  The second phase will consult with Canadians on specific policy recommendations and innovations in a number of thematic areas along the housing spectrum. 

For more information on the first phase, and to submit ideas on the high level outcomes, visit the government’s official consultation website:  www.letstalkhousing.ca

The input of housing advocacy groups will be very important in these consultations, as explained in this blog by CCEDNet member Right to Housing.  The Canadian Housing and Renewal Association has repurposed its Housing4All webpage to share background materials, reports, and previous CHRA interventions to help inform input. The website also provides a questionnaire seeking feedback on a range of policy questions related to the scope of the National Housing Strategy. 

Provide your input! 

Share