Community Sola, your panels, your neighbours panelsThis summer, we’re sending teams of dedicated volunteers out to over 25 communities in Alberta to raise awareness about renewable energy, and to make the case that Alberta has the capacity to ensure “Solar 4 All.”

But what do we mean when we say we want solar for all? And why is it important?

The short of it is that while the “sun shines on everyone” (especially Albertans!), we don’t all have the same ability to tap into solar power and to reap the rewards. As Alberta moves to phase-out coal and introduce more renewables onto its grid, we have a unique opportunity to change not just how our power is generated, but also how it is owned and who and how many get to benefit. If we get it right, we’ll not only gain renewable energy, but also a more resilient and democratic economy.

A renewable energy program that fosters growth in small-scale and community-owned large-scale renewable energy will maximize the benefits of Alberta’s electricity grid transition for everyone.

Attaining those maximum benefits, however, means seeing our electricity system a bit differently. For most of us, energy is an essential good we pay for, but whether or not the power comes from a big coal plant, a wind turbine or a solar panel, or whether the profits go to a multinational company or a local provider isn’t something we question.

Similarly, food is also an essential good we pay for, but we tend to have a more holistic and nuanced understanding of it than we do about electricity. We buy the vast majority of our calories from grocers, but many of us produce some of our own food through gardening. We also know that there is a qualitative difference between a diet geared solely towards calories – 100% pixie sticks! – and one based around nourishment, health, and enjoyment with family, friends and community. The tremendous popularity of Farmer’s Markets in the province indicates that many of us also value purchasing our food locally, and developing relationships with those that produce it. Lastly, many of us understand that access to food – whether due to chronic or temporary poverty, or in times of crisis or disaster – is a problem for many Albertans, and one that we need to work together to overcome.

In other words, while we need calories, we understand that food is more than that – it’s about personal and ecosystem health. It’s about socializing, sharing and learning. Sometimes it’s about supporting the small guys and gals who work hard to produce our food locally, or the people that are unable to access adequate food. It can also be about producing it on our own, if we choose.

Just the same, we need to think about Alberta’s renewable transition as more than just green electrons. While utility-scale renewable energy generation will be a critical part of a sustainable grid, renewables owned and operated by individuals, small businesses and communities, First Nations and Métis settlements can serve an important and prominent role in meeting the province’s energy needs, while offering distinct additional benefits as well.                                               

WHY SOLAR?

Alberta has high natural potential for solar. Calgary is the sunniest major city in Canada – as sunny as Miami, Florida. And a solar system in Edmonton, the third sunniest major city in the country, produces the same amount of energy as a system in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

But just as critically, it’s sunny everywhere in Alberta, so solar PV systems are suitable across the province. While Alberta’s best wind resources are concentrated in a few generally rural areas, the entire province has high potential for solar PV, includes urban areas. This means that most Albertans have a quality natural solar resource in close proximity, so communities and individuals could benefit from an on-site or nearby solar installation.

Because of its natural potential across the province, solar power creates an opportunity for everyone – individuals, neighbourhoods, First Nations/Métis communities, schools, farmer’s associations, municipal districts and other organizations – to lower their power bills, or even make income, while producing their own power and achieving energy sovereignty. Moreover, the fuel cost of solar is zero and maintenance costs are minimal, so solar PV systems can produce ongoing price stability for consumers.

Community-scale solar can also act as a vehicle for unrealized investment demand for renewable energy. For example, a share in Nelson, British Columbia’s solar garden – where ratepayers invest in panels as part of an installation owned by the municipal utility – costs $927 or less. The majority of Albertans don’t have the means to install a full system outright, even if they’d like to put some of their available savings into renewables. Investing in a solar farm jointly with neighbours is a way someone with a little money can strengthen their sense of community and shared purpose, while generating a return on investment. A community solar farm is the energy equivalent of the Oliver community garden in Edmonton, or the Varsity community garden in Calgary.

Solar also provides us a unique opportunity to create educational and community-building experiences. Solar tends to be highly visible in communities and the more contact people have with renewable energy, the more likely they are to approve of it, want it, and want to learn more about it. Once installed, community energy assets become a tool for energy education, built right into the very fabric of a community.Solar. A bright idea for Alberta - Sign the petition today.

WHY FOR ALL?   

Some people might say, “Why do we need special policies to make solar available to all Albertans? It is already is available to anyone that wants to put a system up on their roof.”

True, there is no legal restriction preventing an Alberta homeowner from installing solar on their property, or a First Nation from installing a large solar farm,  if they follow certain rules. But, there’s a big difference between making something legal and creating a system that truly allows everyone to participate in a way that reflects our values of democracy and choice. The fact is, many Albertans don’t have the up-front money for a solar PV system, and many Albertans do not have the ability to install solar on their roof – either because they are apartment dwellers, or because they have an unsuitable roof. Indeed, most people find navigating the financial and regulatory system necessary to install solar PV quite daunting. Alberta’s Micro-Generation Regulation, the rules that enable homeowners to install Solar PV systems, creates some barriers itself.  For example, the regulation does not allow the home or building owner to produce more energy than they consume per year: “the proposed production from a micro-generation unit cannot exceed a micro-generator’s annual electricity needs.” 

So, despite the natural potential for all Albertans to tap into the benefits of solar power, there are many social and economic barriers to access for several segments of the population.

The main barriers Albertans face in procuring their electricity from self-produced solar PV are:

  1. Lack of access to the market and electricity grid (renters, condo-owners, or homeowners with unsuitable roofs, but also system size limits, and a lower price paid to homeowners than utilities at peak demand)
  2. Lack of technical capacity and start-up support (including navigating a complex of regulations)
  3. Lack of access to low-cost  financing and better project economics (including available financing vehicles)

At the large scale, the current model – where power production is left to the open market – is really only open to those with easy access to large amounts of capital and/or the ability to make a detailed assessment of financial risk. Such a model not only limits the number of solar producers, but it fails to consider the multiple benefits a community ownership model of solar generation provides.

So while it is true that the “sun shines on everyone”, it is also true that we don’t all have the same ability to tap into that sun, and harness its energy. This means there is room for the Government to better enable solar by offering better access, capacity, and financing to Albertans who face barriers and prioritizing large scale solar projects that are fully or partially owned by communities, municipalities, farmer associations, First Nations and/or Métis Settlements. This is why we’re asking that the provincial government direct some  of its climate leadership ambitions – policy, staff capacity, and some funding from the upcoming carbon levy – towards making solar accessible to everyone.

COMMUNITY SOLAR IS HERE AND GROWING!

Municipalities and coops are already leading the way in Alberta. The Town of Devon, for example, has a publicly owned Solar PV system mounted on the roof of its community centre that meets all of the facility’s energy needs. Starland County provided extensive technical support and capital subsidies to their “solar pioneers” – farmers who agreed to install arrays on their properties – in order to help them achieve a ten year payback. The Town of Banff provides residents and businesses with a seven year production-based subsidy for their solar PV installations, paid out of the rents utilities pay for right of ways. And finally, the Alberta Solar Co-op will allow individuals to invest RRSPs and TFSAs in a 2MW community-owned solar farm. These are just a few examples of the potential for distributed ownership of solar assets. But we need hundreds of more examples.

Solar power is a unique opportunity for everyone to benefit from Alberta’s transition towards a low-carbon economy. We need to make room for more Devons, more Banffs, more Alberta Solar Co-ops, and more Starland Counties.

Written by Emilia Kennedy and originally published by Greenpeace Canada on June 13, 2016


Emilia KennedyEmilia Kennedy is an Advisor in Cross-Ministry Governance with the Alberta Climate Change Office. At the time this article was written, Emilia was a Government Relations and Policy Coordinator with Greenpeace. Emilia has a PhD in Human Geography from the University of British Columbia, where she studied climate and energy policy. In her academic and civic work she has always been interested in how categorization and spatial language (re)define the contours of the possible. 

Share

Kirsten BernasAfter 8 years at CCEDNet, Kirsten Bernas, our Policy and Research Manager in Manitoba is moving on to a new opportunity with member organization, West Central Women’s Resource Centre (WCWRC).

Kirsten has been a dedicated and passionate advocate for social change and community economic development while at CCEDNet. She has added capacity to multiple coalitions, including Make Poverty History Manitoba, Right to Housing, and the EIA Advocates Network. In that work, she both brought our Network to crucial social policy campaigns and centered a commitment to ending poverty in our community economic development work. She has been committed to member-leadership, both by relying on guidance from members for strategic direction and working to build capacity in our sector around public policy advocacy. Her contributions to research have been valuable, with The View From Here playing a prominent role in poverty reduction advocacy, as well as other reports including an assessment of the impact of work integration social enterprises, and the need for labour market intermediaries.

Her new work as Director of Housing at WCWRC will keep her at the forefront of affordable housing advocacy while also bringing her much closer to communities and individuals directly facing the challenges of housing insecurity.

Our staff team and Board of Directors offer our thanks for her years of service and wish her well as she takes on this new challenge.

For information or communication about CCEDNet’s Manitoba public policy work, please contact Regional Director, Sarah Leeson-Klym at sleesonklym at ccednet-rcdec.ca or 204-943-0547.

Share

Good Jobs + Good Business = Better Community

Good Jobs + Good Business = Better Community, Action PlanOn March 23, 2017 the Victoria City Council adopted the “Good Jobs + Good Business = Better Community” Action Plan developed by the Mayor’s Task Force on Social Enterprise and Social Procurement. The adoption comes with the amendment that the plan include “recent immigrants” as a strategic group of focus.

Using an ecosystem-based approach to community economic development, the action plan focuses to a large degree on efforts to get the unemployed, underemployed and marginalized into employment. The plan identifies three sets of recommendations that will strengthen the City’s procurement practices to maximize community benefit as well as support small business and social enterprise sectors.

The three recommendations include:

  • Social Procurement: purchases should be leveraged to improve the economic, social and environmental well-being of the community
  • Social Enterprise Development: strengthen and grow businesses already doing business with community benefit in mind and grow the social enterprise sector
  • Leading Economic Change: make the mainstream economy more inclusive to ensure there is always an opportunity for everyone to prosper

Each recommendation has a set of actions and tasks to be implemented over the next five years to achieve prescribed outcomes. Leads and supports in the community to help achieve these outcomes are noted and include the City of Victoria, local organizations, agencies and business. Next steps will include City staff developing a Social Procurement Framework and work plan for Council’s consideration.

Read the “Good Jobs + Good Business = Better Community” Action Plan 

About the Task Force

The Task Force on Social Enterprise and Social Procurement was a recommendation of the Mayor’s Task Force on Economic Development and Prosperity, which with input from the community, developed the City’s economic action plan, Making Victoria: Unleashing Potential in 2015. The economic action plan identifies six engines to drive economic prosperity, generate jobs and raise household incomes. One engine that encompasses the rest is entrepreneurship and social enterprise.

Source: The City of Victoria

Share
Advancing Social Enterprise in Nova Scotia Nova Scotia Social Enterprise Sector Strategy 2017

The Government of Nova Scotia announced on April 12 that they will be working with the Social Enterprise Network of Nova Scotia to help more social enterprises start and expand.

A social enterprise is a business operated to address social, cultural, environmental or economic challenges. Most profits are reinvested to support that purpose.

The Nova Scotia Social Enterprise Sector Strategy 2017, developed by the Social Enterprise Network, aims to build business skills, enhance access to financing, expand market opportunities, promote and demonstrate the sector’s value, create a supportive policy and legislative environment, and build a strong network. 

The Government’s plan, Advancing Social Enterprise in Nova Scotia, identifies actions it will take to help advance social enterprise with the sector. An initial $200,000 investment will support two projects:

  • developing a portal where entrepreneurs can access resources and training, and
  • conducting research into the economic and social value created by social enterprise

These strategies were developed based on the work of the Social Enterprise Council of Canada, and with input from social entrepreneurs, associations, government departments and other Nova Scotians. 

“The Social Enterprise Network of Nova Scotia is thrilled that our government, through its framework, has recognized the value and power of social enterprise. These businesses are transforming communities and contributing to the social, cultural, environmental and economic well-being in every corner of the province.”
    ~ Cathy Deagle-Gammon, president of the Social Enterprise Network of Nova Scotia.

SOURCE: The Government of Nova Scotia

Share

toronto enterprise fundThe Toronto Enterprise Fund (TEF) has announced the launch of its 2017 Business Plan Competition. The competition is open to new non-profit social enterprises that provide transitional or permanent employment for people who are marginalized. A social enterprise is a business operated by a non-profit that sells goods and services in the market place, for the dual purpose of generating income and achieving a social, cultural or environmental goal. TEF always requires the submission of a comprehensive business plan; you can get started with your planning by visiting the “Thinking about Starting a Social Enterprise” and “Starting a Social Enterprise” pages.

This year, the deadline for submissions to the Competition is October 6, 2017. The first place winner can receive up to $75,000 in seed funding. A total of $155,000 is available for the winners.

Register by May 1
Create a feasibility study by June 23

To enter the competition, your organization or group must be starting a non-profit social enterprise, attend all the workshops (see content and dates below), create a feasibility study (by June 23) and finally submit a comprehensive business plan prior to the Oct 6 deadline. For more details on eligibility, please read through the eligibility criteria of the Business Plan Competition. If you plan to submit a business plan to the competition, please register for the workshops below.

Please note that in the future, TEF will not run a Business Plan Competition, but will have a different process for funding new social enterprises.

2017 TEF Business Planning Workshops

The workshops will be held at the United Way Office – 26 Wellington East, 12th Floor, Boardroom A.

  • Introduction to Social Enterprise – Tuesday, May 2nd 1:00pm to 4:00pm
  • Feasibility and Market Research – Friday, May 19th 9:30am to 12:30pm
  • Social Programming Design – Friday, June 9th 9:30am to 12:30pm
  • Financial Planning for Social Enterprise – Friday, June 26th 9:30am to 12:30pm

Register for the TEF Business Planning Workshop Series

If you require additional information, please check the website or contact 
Anne at (416) 777-1444 ext. 513 or ajamieson at uwgt.org or
Litza at (416) 777-1444 ext. 235 or lchatzibas at uwgt.org.

SOURCE: The Toronto Enterprise Fund

Share

MANITOBA BUDGET 2017Leading up to the first full budget by the new provincial government, there was a significant amount of apprehension among community groups around austerity and potential spending cuts.  With 15,000 children waiting for child care, 7,500 housing units needed to respond to homelessness in Winnipeg alone, and 132,000 Manitobans living in poverty, it would have been harmful to balance the budget on the backs of vulnerable Manitobans.

However, Budget 2017 is a mixed bag, with more program reductions than investments in CCEDNet-Manitoba’s member priorities, but more programs maintained than some had expected.

For instance, we are glad to see the government increase funding for Rent Assist and maintain funding for the Northern Healthy Foods Initiative while also giving a prominent role to social enterprise. However, cuts to community development, co-operative development and affordable housing, along with a stall on a comprehensive poverty reduction plan, will work against supporting inclusive communities and economies in Manitoba.

See Budget 2017 here.

As the provincial government continues to define its course, it will take some work on the part of community organizations, social enterprises and cooperatives to find their role in the path forward. The following analysis covers areas of provincial policy important to the work of CCEDNet Manitoba members. To see our submission to the Budget 2017 consultation process, visit here.

Community Development

Programs under Community Planning and Development in Indigenous and Municipal Relations have seen a significant reorganization, but some consistency in amounts. Funding for Neighbourhoods Alive! (NA!) will be maintained at the same spending level as the previous year but the Province underspent last year as a result of pausing NA! programs mid-year. Therefore, the NA! budget has been reduced by  approximately $900,000 (or 15%), from $5.97 M in Budget 2016/17 to $5.08 M in 2017/18. In speaking to a government representative, we learned that the department is establishing new program delivery processes, and anticipates further consultation with non-profit organizations. There is no stated commitment to existing multi-year funding agreements, and organizations funded under these programs should reach out to their department contacts for further information.

Included in the reorganization is the elimination of the Urban Development Initiative and Rural Economic Development Initiative. We learned that this funding has not been cut, but permanently allocated to departments with initiatives funded via these programs. Those departments now have discretion over their allocation. Funding initiatives through IMR have been collapsed into a new program called Community Development Initiatives. Intake and funding criteria for this fund have not been announced at this time.

Co-op Development

Cooperatives are hard hit in this budget, with the cancellation of the Co-op Community Strategy, and the elimination of the Co-op Development Tax Credit. While elements of the strategy are being maintained, accounting for $70,000 in spending, total spending on Co-op Development has gone from $601,000 to $456,000, which is a decrease of $145,000 or 24%. We hope that despite these changes, we will see a new way forward for cooperatives in Manitoba and will be asking the government to consider how they can support these inclusive, democratic community enterprises.

Social Enterprise

CCEDNet Manitoba called on the Province to grow its social procurement commitments to $10M (currently at $7M). Social enterprise was specifically highlighted in the Budget Paper “REDUCING POVERTY AND PROMOTING COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT”. In a section titled Front-Line Services Through Innovative Partnerships, this Budget Paper celebrates Manitoba Housing’s practice of social procurement, highlighting the five social enterprises that are providing services to Manitoba Housing (New Directions – Genesis, NECRC – Building Construction Mentorship Program, BNRC – Brandon Energy Efficiency Program, BUILD and Manitoba Green Retrofit) and the collective 220 jobs this provides for individuals facing barriers to employment. It also notes the training partnership with social enterprise Diversity Foods. We are glad to see this prominent mention of these CCEDNet Manitoba members. However, it is unclear if the government is planning to change the amount of procurement currently going to social enterprise, or expand the practice beyond Manitoba Housing.

Despite mentioning the significant social return on investment generated by the social enterprise strategy, it is also unclear if the government is planning to continue funding the sector-developing strategy in partnership with CCEDNet Manitoba.

One policy priority for CCEDNet Manitoba is to see the Justice department reverse its trend towards greater incarceration through prevention and reintegration by engaging social enterprises that support individuals involved with, or at-risk of involvement, with the criminal justice system. The Justice department’s operating budget has increased 2.1% (or by $12.2M), from $586.5M in 2016/17 to $598.7M in 2017/18 — these increases can be partially offset by more programming for prevention and reintegration to keep individuals out of the criminal justice system. The Community Safety budget, which includes funding for correctional services as well as crime prevention policies and programs has increased from $410.6 M to $420.5 M. However, there is no mention of social enterprise as a tool for crime prevention and reintegration.

Social Finance

The Budget reiterates the government’s commitment to launching a “made-in-Manitoba approach to Social Impact Bonds,” (SIBs) however it is not clear if there is any budget allocation for the development of SIBs, nor the fields they are planning to execute SIBs in.

The Neighbourhoods Alive! Tax Credit has been cancelled. While this program, which provided a 45% tax credit to corporations who donated $50,000 or more to a non-profit organization to establish a social enterprise, needed improvements (it had only been used once since its inception), CCEDNet Manitoba members still see potential in the opportunity to partner with corporations for social enterprise development.

The Community Enterprise Development Tax Credit is being maintained. We will continue to advocate that the Government of Manitoba improve the application process for this tax credit and better promote it to the community.

Northern Healthy Foods Initiative

CCEDNet called on the Manitoba government to increase funding to the Northern Healthy Foods Initiative (NHFI) to scale up healthy food production and consumption, in part through social enterprise, in northern and remote communities. Funding for the NHFI has been maintained at $1.2M for 2017/18. While we are happy to see NFHI funding maintained, this amount continues to be insufficient to address the challenges and costs of food insecurity in remote and northern communities. For instance, the economic burden of diabetes in Manitoba in 2010 was estimated to be approximately $86M in direct costs and an additional $412 M in indirect costs. Investments in healthy food is an important component in addressing this cost and we hope to see additional programs and investments to address this issue.

It is not clear at this time how much, if any, of NHFI’s funding will be earmarked for social enterprise development, or if there is any other funding specific to social enterprise development in northern and rural Manitoba.

Minimum Wage

For a second year in a row, the Manitoba government has not increased the minimum wage.  It continues to sit at $11.00 per hour since last increased in October 2015 meaning that those working for minimum wage will continue to see their incomes fall behind what is needed to afford the cost of living. This continues to break the 17-year trend of regular minimum wage increases despite full-time minimum wage work still failing to bring Manitoba families above the poverty line.

Childcare

The Early Learning and Child Care budget increased by just over $6M in Budget 2017. The Province promises funding for 501 new licensed child care spaces and 50 new home-based spaces to help shorten child care wait times. It also promises to increase operating grants for home-based child-care providers. While childcare advocates welcome this small increase, it does not go far enough to meet the needs of more than 14,500 children who are on the online child care registry waitlist. This disproportionately affects women, as they are more often prevented from education and employment opportunities due to a lack of accessible child care.

Visit the Manitoba Child Care Association for more information.

Poverty Reduction Strategy

Make Poverty History Manitoba was anticipating the launch of a comprehensive poverty reduction strategy in Budget 2017 based on last year’s budget which noted that work would begin immediately on the development of such a strategy in preparation for Budget 2017. However, the budget now notes that the updated strategy is not expected to be launched until late 2017. Make Poverty History Manitoba has called for a comprehensive plan developed in partnership with the community and accompanied by targets and timelines for reducing poverty. Budget 2017 notes that the development of the provincial strategy will include an engagement process to identify the priorities of Manitobans. It also notes that the province will develop targeted performance indicators.

Make Poverty History Manitoba prioritized the need to increase the basic needs budget for Manitobans on EIA and transition to a portable benefit, like Rent Assist, to make the benefit available to the working poor. The goal was to bring all Manitobans to at least 75% of the poverty line in Budget 2017. The budget does not make any reference to increasing EIA rates.

Visit Make Poverty History Manitoba for more information.

Housing

Right to Housing called on the Province to commit to 300 new social housing units built by the public, non-profit and co-op sectors to help address the need for affordable housing. However, Budget 2017 does not set a target and timeline for building new social housing. Budget 2017 provides up to $149M for capital (new supply and maintaining existing supply). This is down from $280M in 2016, and it is roughly a third of what was available on an annual basis when the Province was investing in a capital program that delivered 1,500 units between 2009 and 2014. This reduction in the amount available for capital combined with a $20M dollar reduction for operations leaves Manitoba Housing with approximately $150M less for its social and affordable housing programs than what was in last year’s budget.

Budget 2017 continues to invest in Rent Assist, a program that provides an income benefit (up to 75% of median market rent) to low-income Manitobans to top up their rent. Its budget line was increased, in part to be able to index the benefit to keep up with rising rental costs. But the benefit itself will not be enhanced.

Visit Right to Housing for more information.

Accessibility for Manitobans

All parties passed The Accessibility for Manitobans Act (AMA) in 2013 to achieve the comprehensive prevention and removal of barriers. The Conservative party committed to the full and timely implementation of the AMA during the 2016 provincial election. The AMA establishes responsibility for achieving significant progress toward accessibility by 2023, but implementation is lagging. CCEDNet Manitoba called on the Province to invest significantly increased human and related resources to ensure the timely and effective implementation of the AMA. The Disability Issues Office is the government unit most responsible for the implementation of the Accessibility for Manitobans Act and it received a welcome 20.7% increase. However, implementation is an immense responsibility that has been gravely underfunded to date.

Visit Barrier Free Manitoba for more information.

Environmental Omissions

Climate change is a defining issue of our time, imposing high and escalating costs on society over the coming decades and centuries. It requires clear, effective, and decisive action to reduce emissions. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development estimates that every dollar the industrialized world fails to invest in clean energy today will cost more than four dollars down the road. CCEDNet’s membership called on the Manitoba government to implement a carbon pricing strategy as well as ban on organics disposal by 2020.

Unfortunately, climate change does not have a significant role in this budget. There is no mention of carbon pricing or an organics disposal beyond a reiteration of a previous commitment to develop a climate and green plan in the future.


Kirsten BernasKirsten Bernas is Research and Policy Manager with CCEDNet in Manitoba. She has also been employed by the Province of Manitoba to work on CED and social policy. Kirsten represents CCEDNet on the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives‘ Alternative Federal Budget Steering Committee, Make Poverty History Manitoba‘s Steering Committee, and the Right to Housing Coalition‘s Provincial Committee. She received a BA (Honours) in Economics from the University of Manitoba as well as an MA from the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa.

Darcy PennerDarcy Penner has been working in community economic development since graduating from the University of Winnipeg with a BA (Honours) degree in Politics. Starting at CCEDNet in 2013, his role has seen him work with member-organizations to pursue a broad policy agenda through workshops, presentations, budget submissions, policy papers and community-organizing, while specializing in supportive social enterprise policy and research – including being the Project Manager for the Manitoba Social Enterprise Strategy being co-produced with the Province of Manitoba, and coordinating the Manitoba Social Enterprise Sector Survey. 

Share

ccednet manitoba“Climate change is a defining issue of our time, imposing high and escalating costs on society over the coming decades and centuries. It requires clear, effective, and decisive action to reduce emissions. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development estimates that every dollar the industrialized world fails to invest in clean energy today will cost more than four dollars down the road.”

CCEDNet-Manitoba with support from members in the province has made a submission to the Manitoba Climate and Green Plan survey outlining important environmental actions to growing a strong, equitable, and sustainable economy. 

Read the full submission to the Manitoba Climate and Green Plan survey

In the submission the following recommendations to the Government of Manitoba were made:

Carbon Pricing

  1. Impose a carbon levy with a floor of $30/tonne based on British Columbia’s successful model, rising to $200 over time.
  2. Complement the carbon tax with a strong set of regulations to reduce emissions from agriculture and transportation.
  3. Establish a carbon tax credit for Manitobans living below the low-income cut-off.
  4. Recycle the remainder of revenues to deploy low-carbon technology and energy systems that make it easier for the public to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels.

Waste Disposal

  1. a. Announce a deadline of 2020 for a full organics disposal ban in the Manitoba Capital Region.
    b. Introduce and enforce a phased fine for any organic material that is landfilled in the Manitoba Capital Region after 2020, with an initial threshold of 25% organic matter landfilled and decreasing to 5% by 2023.
  2. Support the transition to improved organics management by:
    1. Offering a financial incentive to approved transfer stations and facilities that compost organic material in the Manitoba Capital Region.
    2. Making municipal waste management plans that include the diversion and composting of organic materials mandatory for the Manitoba Capital Region.
    3. Creating a provincial waste management plan that builds on the community expertise gathered in earlier government consultations.
    4. Implementing policies, funding and social procurement programs to support small businesses, social enterprises, and community initiatives that meet environmental, social and economic goals (i.e. diverting organics from landfills, improving community sustainability resources and providing local training and jobs).

Manitoba Housing

  1. CCEDNet Manitoba recommends that Manitoba Housing provide social enterprises with energy retrofit work as part of accomplishing the goal of $10M in procurement annually.

Efficiency Manitoba

  1. Give Efficiency Manitoba a mandate to partner with social enterprises in green economy initiatives.
  2. Provide targets and timelines for ensuring green economy initiatives create jobs for Manitobans with barriers to employment.

Community-Owned Green Energy

  1. Update the Manitoba Hydro Act to support the creation and maintenance of community-owned renewable energy, including:
    1. Implementing a long-term Feed-In-Tariff along with provisions to appoint an independent committee to set an acceptable price.
    2. Allowing and directing Manitoba Hydro to purchase power from community-owned renewable energy projects and that these projects be developed in consultation with the communities affected.

Read the full submission to the Manitoba Climate and Green Plan survey

Share

MP Ramesh SanghaOn April 7, MP Ramesh Sangha introduced Bill C-344, a private member’s bill that would authorize the Minister of Public Works to require an explanation of anticipated community benefits when bids are submitted for federal infrastructure projects. Similar legislation (Bill C-227) had previously passed second reading and committee stage in the House, but had to be dropped from consideration when its sponsor, the Hon. Ahmed Hussen, was named to cabinet.

Transcript of the Motion

“Mr. Speaker, I am absolutely honoured to stand in the House, with the support of the member for Don Valley North, to introduce my first private member’s bill, the community benefit act, or CBA, regarding the federal investment in infrastructure.

“The CBA is the modern way of giving power to communities. This will benefit not only my riding of Brampton Centre but ridings across Canada. My bill will define what community benefits are and how government can collaborate with communities to obtain maximum benefits. The CBA will provide for community participation so they can achieve their fair share of the federal government’s spending. The CBA will ensure reliable growth and meaningful employment while fostering a healthier environment.”

More information on Bill C-344

Share

Motion M-100 Adopted in Unanimity by House of CommonsThe Parliament of Canada has voted unanimously to adopt Motion M-100, sending a clear message and mandate to the Government of Canada. M-100 is a Private Member’s Motion, tabled by Liberal M.P. Alexandra Mendès (Brossard – St-Lambert), to establish a framework that will promote the recognition and development of co-operatives in Canada.

The motion also asks Innovation, Science and Economic Development (ISED) to establish a national co-operative development strategy.

CMC President, Doug Potentier applauded the vote: “This motion is an important step toward building public and government understanding of how co-operatives contribute to economic growth and prosperity in line with the governments own priorities.  Energy transition, indigenous and rural community development, emerging digital platforms, homecare, health care and any number of other challenges we face today are ideally suited to co-operative solutions.”  

The vote result was 284 yeas and zero nays.

Text of the Motion

That, in the opinion of the House, the government should recognize the important role co-operatives play in the economy and ensure that they continue to thrive by taking concrete steps such as: (a) developing, in consultation with provincial and territorial governments, Indigenous communities and the co‑operative sector, a federal co-operative strategy to promote and support Canada’s co-operative sector; and (b) providing periodic progress reports on pre‑established goals and targets.

Background

In 2012, a Special Committee on the Status of Co-operatives, chaired by M.P. Blake Richards, made a series of recommendations. One key recommendation that was accepted and enacted by the government was to move responsibility for co-operatives from its historic home in the Secretariat at Agriculture and Agri‑Food Canada to Industry Canada (now ISED). This move better represented the current diversity of businesses that are innovating with the co-operative model and was a step toward equal access to business support programs.

The transfer of responsibility, it was said, would ensure a single focal point in government to facilitate development, innovation and growth in Canada’s co‑operative sector. The government also welcomed the opportunity to engage with co-operatives and to further review their business programming to help support the sector. This was welcome news within the Co-op Sector. Unfortunately, there was no instruction or clarity on how the relationship between the department and the co-operative sector should evolve. Now, four years later, there has been very limited movement on many aspects of the intended relationship.

M-100 is the platform upon which the government can engage with co‑operative and mutual stakeholders. To solve our challenges together using the co-operative model, the Government of Canada needs to promote the co-operative model, contribute to its development, and facilitate an exchange and dialogue with the co-operative sector. Motion M-100 is catalyst to achieving that goal.

SOURCE: Co-operatives and Mutuals Canada

Share

Carol Anne HiltonThe Board of the Canadian CED Network (CCEDNet) is pleased to announce that Carol Anne Hilton has been named Director for a term ending at the 2018 Annual General Meeting.

Carol Anne Hilton, MBA is the CEO of Transformation International an award winning Social and Economic development company. Carol Anne is a recognized leading First Nation’s business entrepreneur with a Masters Degree in Business Management (MBA) from the University of Hertfordshire, England. Carol Anne is from the Nuu chah nulth Nation on Vancouver Island.

Carol Anne works to incorporate an Aboriginal worldview while bringing First Nations, industry and government together to design new approaches for sustainable, inclusive development. Carol Anne brings project management experience across industries in resource management, governance, and regional development.

Carol Anne is currently authoring ‘Indigenomics – a Global Power Shift’ and has been an instructor at Camosun Business School Leadership Program as well as at Simon Fraser University’s Community Economic Development Program, the University of Winnipeg’s Masters in Community Planning Program and most recently with the Banff Center Indigenous Business Program.

Transformation InternationalTransformation has been recognized with a BC Aboriginal Outstanding Business Achievement Award, a Creating Wealth Award from the National Indigenous Council of Elders and Business of the Year Award from the Nuu chah nulth Economic Development Corporation. In November 2015, Carol Anne was also recently nominated for work in multi-culturalism by the BC Government.

Carol Anne was recently appointed as an advisor on the Federal Economic Growth Council. Carol Anne currently serves as Director on the Vancouver Island Investment Fund, the World Fisheries Trust, the Victoria Community Micro Lending Society, and is a Director on Community Social Planning Council as well as a past Director of the founding board for the First Nations Health Authority and served for 9 years on Council of Hesquiaht First Nation.

Learn more about Carol Anne and other Board members

Board membership is open to all CCEDNet members, with at-large Director positions elected each year.  If you are interested in joining the Board, contact us or watch for the annual call for Board nominations, which is usually sent to members in February. 

Share

Check out the latest keynote speakers we have confirmed for Hopeful Economics: Leadership & Innovation Summit. To see the full speakers list visit our website.

Hopeful Economics:Leadership and Innovation Summit, which explores themes of economic reconciliation, social enterprise, entrepreneurship, community benefit agreements and local impact investing, is being co-hosted by Simon Fraser University’s Community Economic Development Programs and the City of Vancouver April 21-22, 2017 in downtown Vancouver.

Register for Inspiring Speakers at Hopeful Economics here

Keynote Speakers

Gulalai Habib has been working with displaced populations for over 25 years. She works with the Immigrant Services Society of B.C., is on the board of directors of the Women’s Economic Council and Common Thread Workers Co-operative. Gulalai will speak on the changes in refugees’ experiences in Canada since 2000, and the pressing need for social innovation and holistic approaches to ensure immigrant and refugee success in Canada.  

Charlene Aleck is a granddaughter of Chief Dan George, a mother of four and a grandmother. She’s an elected Councilor for the Tsleil-Waututh Nation (TWN) and a spokesperson for the TWN Sacred Trust Initiative. Charlene is dedicated to the protection and restoration of the land and water her people have stewarded since time immemorial. Charlene will present the Tsleil-Waututh’s vision for their economic future. TWN does not view economic development separately from social, ecological or spiritual development.  TWN is leading the opposition to Kinder Morgan Pipeline on behalf of the members of TWN, Squamish and Cold Water. TWN is also developing several long-term economic projects including restoration of shellfish beds in the Burrard Inlet and TWN Wind Power.

Danielle Levine is CEO of social enterprise Kanuu Indigenous Innovation Society and serves on the board of the Vancouver Native Housing Society. Most recently she ran the Ch’nook Indigenous Business Education program at UBC’s Sauder School of Business where she taught business, coached and inspired Indigenous leaders and entrepreneurs from across Canada. She has also taught business and has been a business advisor at other post secondary institutions and consulting firms in B.C. Danielle’s presentation will outline social enterprise opportunities that have the most potential for large impact in the area of economic empowerment and reconciliation.

Sean Markey is an associate professor with the School of Resource and Environmental Management at Simon Fraser University (SFU). He is author and editor of six books and numerous articles, reports related to sustainable community and regional economic development, rural and small town development, and sustainable infrastructure. In addition to his academic roles, Sean teaches with the SFU Community Economic Development Program and serves on the board of directors of the Vancity Community Foundation and the Silva Forest Foundation. Sean’s talk will highlight ecosystem conservation planning efforts in the Still Creek watershed, drawing connections between healthy ecosystems and healthy economies.

Sign up to get the latest updates about Hopeful Economics: Leadership & Innovation Summit.

Share

city of ottawa

The CIty of Ottawa is seeking project proposals that promote economic development while demonstrating environmental, cultural and/or social benefits.

The Community Economic Development (CED) Funding Program is an annual program that provides financial support to projects that advance: job creation, economic diversity, entrepreneurship and small business development, skills development, innovation, and tourism while also demonstrating environmental, social, and/or cultural benefits.

All applicants must complete the Community Economic Development Funding Program application form for project funding requests.

Request the application form from the CED Program Coordinator by email

Project funding requests could range from $5,000 to a maximum of $50,000. For requests greater than $25,000, a detailed project plan and budget is required as part of the application. The project plan is a summary of the work to be done and details the goals, activities, outcomes, and resources. The plan should be linked to the budget and include timelines for completion. The purchase of goods and services should ensure value for money and must follow ethical and fair procurement practices. Successful applicants must spend the total awarded funding and submit reporting requirements by December 31, 2017.

Projects need to deliver broad, sustainable economic benefits and demonstrate continued benefits after the funding has ended. Additional consideration will be given to projects that advance and foster innovation, promote partnerships, and have other funding sources or in-kind contributions.

The projects/programs must meet the following principal criteria:

  • Demonstrate how they will positively affect the development of the local economy
  • Demonstrate the need for assistance and value for money
  • Demonstrate what environmental, social and/or cultural benefits will likely accrue to the community.

For more information visit ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/funding/economic-development-funding

Share