Almost 300 hundred years ago, facing major poverty, exclusion and inequalities, men and women created a new way to meet their needs: co-operatives and mutuals (CM). The model, inspired by values of equality, democracy, freedom, equity, solidarity and empowerment, has evolved in its practice and theory, and has had significant impacts on development. Still today, this project of innovative organization challenges our understanding of economy and business management.

Prepared for the International Summit on Co-operatives held in October 2012 in Québec City, the Institut de recherche et d’éducation pour les coopératives et les mutuelles de l’Université de Sherbrooke (IRECUS) has carried out a vast study of the accomplishments and future challenges for co-operatives and mutuals. 

The objectives of the study were the following: 1) to establish a global portrayal of the socio-economic impact of co-operatives and mutuals and their contribution to build a better world; 2) to further the understanding of the successes and challenges of this business model and how co-operative identity plays a role.

This study confirms the relevance of the model and explains its contribution to a better world, with three main dynamics, proper to its identity. Effectively, cooperatives and mutuals directly contribute to: 1) assuring economic, social and political stabilization and regulation; 2) maintaining an equitable access to goods and services; 3) promoting economic, social and political diversity and inclusion.

Download the summary >>

For the full study and references >>

 

 

Share

Growing out of the Metcalf Foundation’s Inclusive Local Economies Program in Toronto, resilienteconomies.ca is a platform for communication, collaboration and innovation on economic well-being in low-income neighbourhoods.

On the website, you can:

  • Hear different perspectives on common concerns via a blog.
  • Share your ideas, resources and information about upcoming events.
  • Find potential collaborators and inspiration for your work.
  • Get connected to a growing network dedicated to creating real economic opportunities for all in tough times and difficult circumstances.

The Metcalf Foundation’s Inclusive Local Economies Program was created as a response to profound changes in the world of work.

In the past, many low-wage jobs were the first rung on an economic ladder leading to greater skills, meaningful work, and higher pay. Today’s low-wage jobs are becoming dead-ends, short-term positions without prospects for earning a decent living or providing for a family.

This reality is tearing the social and economic fabric of our cities – dampening aspirations, producing poverty and growing inequality. It’s also mobilizing uncommon collaborators around promising solutions and across traditional lines.

Read more about why and how the Metcalf Foundation is engaging in this new approach to economic development!

Share

A press release issued by the Chantier de l’économie sociale today welcomed the Québec government’s 2013-2014 budget, which contains several positive measures supporting the social economy. 

The full press release is below (in French only) but highlights include:

  • 3,000 new housing units through the AccèsLogis program
  • 28,000 new childcare spaces at $7/day
  • A proposed general law on the social economy to be followed by a parliamentary commission
  • A new Development Bank whose mandate will include support for non-profit and cooperative social economy enterprises

See the original press release >>


Québec, le 20 novembre 2012 – Le Chantier de l’économie sociale tient à saluer plusieurs mesures du nouveau budget du gouvernement du Québec dévoilé aujourd’hui, notamment en ce qui concerne la construction de 3 000 nouveaux logements dans le programme AccèsLogis et la création de 28 000 nouvelles places à 7$ en services de garde.

Le Chantier salue également la reconnaissance de la contribution de l’économie sociale au développement économique du Québec, notamment avec la future loi-cadre et le mandat de la nouvelle Banque de développement qui aura la responsabilité de soutenir les entreprises d’économie sociale à statut coopératif et à but non lucratif.  Il est aussi intéressant de souligner la volonté d’explorer des stratégies permettant d’accroître l’investissement privé en économie sociale, une voie déjà mise en œuvre par les outils financiers du Chantier.

La nouvelle Banque de développement jouera un rôle central dans les stratégies économiques du gouvernement du Québec, y inclut par ses interventions sur le plan régional. « Dans cette perspective, le Chantier de l’économie sociale insiste sur l’importance d’assurer la présence d’au moins un(e) représentant(e) de l’économie sociale au sein des nouveaux Conseils de développement régionaux. Il s’agit de traduire ainsi l’esprit d’une loi-cadre visant à reconnaître et à intégrer l’entrepreneuriat collectif dans l’ensemble des actions gouvernementales », a déclaré Nancy Neamtan, présidente-directrice générale du Chantier.

Toutefois, le Chantier demeure sur sa faim en ce qui a trait à certains dossiers d’une importance fondamentale pour le développement des collectivités. Le virage annoncé en faveur des soins et services à domicile et un soutien accru aux entreprises d’économie sociale en aide à domicile doit s’accompagner de moyens concrets dont les détails ne sont pas encore connus. Tout comme le soutien qui sera accordé à l’innovation sociale et aux activités de transfert de connaissances dans la future Politique nationale de la recherche et de l’innovation constitue également un enjeu important pour les acteurs de l’économie sociale à travers le Québec.

Soulignons que, depuis plusieurs années, à l’instar d’autres pays sur tous les continents, le rôle joué par les entreprises d’économie sociale est en pleine expansion dans toutes les régions du Québec. Dans son nouveau budget, le gouvernement du Québec démontre une véritable volonté de reconnaître la contribution essentielle de l’économie sociale au développement des collectivités et d’assurer un soutien équitable à cette forme d’entreprise. « Ce choix est d’autant plus judicieux au moment où il faut restaurer la confiance des citoyens et des citoyennes face aux dérapages dans certains secteurs économiques et dans l’octroi des contrats publics. Avec leurs pratiques de transparence et de gestion démocratique, les entreprises d’économie sociale contribuent à créer de la richesse tout en assurant un rendement à l’ensemble de la collectivité. » a conclu madame Neamtan.

Share

Calling all Young Social Innovators!

If you have a great idea for a new socially responsible product, service or business model, OCE’s Social Enterprise Student Competition is for you! This is your chance to receive guidance in developing a business plan for your social enterprise and present it to leading social innovation experts at an open pitch competition. Up to four prizes of $20,000 will be awarded to the winners to develop their social enterprises.  The 10 semi-finalists will also receive a reimbursement of up to $1,000 for eligible expenses incurred in the course of preparing their business plan.

Showcase your idea in a three-minute video, using props or whatever creative presentation technique you can devise. Submissions will be broadcast on OCE’s YouTube channel and linked from our Facebook page. Don’t miss your opportunity to be a part of the next generation of social entrepreneurs!

Competition Guidelines and Eligibility

Download the Complete Guidelines and Eligiblity >>

Share

Despite the services available to them, those who are homeless find it extremely difficult to move permanently out of shelters into stable, long-term housing.

The November 2012 issue of Policy Options profiled SEDI’s Independent Living Account program, which has supported 350 individuals from eight Toronto transitional housing facilities.   Over 300 of them have opened bank accounts, and collectively they have saved over $100,000.  Nearly 150 participants have graduated from the program and moved into permanent housing.

The secret to the ILA’s success is its holistic approach to the financial needs of shelter residents. The program looks beyond minimum income needs to address the critical role that savings and saving behaviour plays in providing people with a financial safety cushion for emergencies and periods of transition, enabling them to invest in their own future.

Download the full article >>

Share
The Canadian CED Network – Manitoba has weighed in on the Province of Manitoba’s new environmental action plan. Tomorrow Now – Manitoba’s Green Plan outlines an eight-year strategy for protecting the environment while ensuring economic prosperity. 
 
In our response, CCEDNet recommends that the plan include a broader definition of the term ‘sustainable,’ to acknowledge the interconnectedness of economic, social and environmental factors. We have also proposed that the province explicitly include community-owned wind energy, support for co-ops and social enterprises, and strategies to localize our food economy in Tomorrow Now. An additional cause for concern was a lack of specificity around ethical procurement strategies. The previous Sustainable Development Act included determined procurement goals and accountability, while the Green Prosperity Act hardly mentioned it at all.
 
Despite these shortcomings, CCEDNet recognizes that Tomorrow Now marks a significant step in the right direction towards creating a truly sustainable and robust economy in Manitoba.
 
Share

By Camille JensenOriginally posted on axiomnews.ca

Unleashing Local Capital’s pilot communities will convene next week to share best practices in local investment and economic development.

Unleashing Local Capital was launched by the Alberta Community and Co-operative Association last spring with a mission to revitalize rural communities.  Funded by the Rural Alberta Development Fund, the initiative aims to build community investment co-ops to solve one of the main challenges to rural development, access to capital to finance local business development and succession planning.

Four pilot communities — Vegreville, Crowsnest Pass, Olds and Fahler — have since created community investment co-operatives tackling issues like affordable housing, seniors housing and business succession planning.

ACCA’s director of co-op development Paul Cabaj says the community investment funds are demonstrating what’s possible when communities take development into their own hands instead of waiting for intervention.

“In some ways intervention is not the solution, it’s got to come from people identifying the needs locally and really leveraging their social capital and their love for their community and their willingness to invest in it,” Paul tells ACCA News.

When reflecting on the initiative so far, Paul says there is a sense of pride in the fact that the community investment funds haven’t faced any major roadblocks, and investments are RRSP-eligible.

He adds it’s been interesting to see how community investment funds can actually spark new interest and competition from other entrepreneurs, which one of the community funds is experiencing.

The four pilot communities will be gathering in Red Deer, one day before ACCA hosts its Gathering of Alberta Co-operatives, where they will share best practices and build connections among the communities.

“It’s bringing the family together,” Paul says, adding relationships and sharing lessons among the group is key to success.

“We really need to learn from each other and establish a base moving forward.”.

The meeting will be recorded with some of the sessions used for training other groups interested in starting a community investment co-op.

Peter Couchman, chief executive of the Plunkett Foundation, will also be presenting a keynote during the day, sharing how the United Kingdom’s co-operative movement has been able to solve social problems, and in doing so caught the attention of the federal .

For more information on Unleashing Local Capital, see the ACCA website

Share

By Camille JensenOriginally posted on axiomnews.ca

Unleashing Local Capital’s pilot communities will convene next week to share best practices in local investment and economic development.

Unleashing Local Capital was launched by the Alberta Community and Co-operative Association last spring with a mission to revitalize rural communities.  Funded by the Rural Alberta Development Fund, the initiative aims to build community investment co-ops to solve one of the main challenges to rural development, access to capital to finance local business development and succession planning.

Four pilot communities — Vegreville, Crowsnest Pass, Olds and Fahler — have since created community investment co-operatives tackling issues like affordable housing, seniors housing and business succession planning.

ACCA’s director of co-op development Paul Cabaj says the community investment funds are demonstrating what’s possible when communities take development into their own hands instead of waiting for government intervention.

“In some ways government intervention is not the solution, it’s got to come from people identifying the needs locally and really leveraging their social capital and their love for their community and their willingness to invest in it,” Paul tells ACCA News.

When reflecting on the initiative so far, Paul says there is a sense of pride in the fact that the community investment funds haven’t faced any major roadblocks, and investments are RRSP-eligible.

He adds it’s been interesting to see how community investment funds can actually spark new interest and competition from other entrepreneurs, which one of the community funds is experiencing.

The four pilot communities will be gathering in Red Deer, one day before ACCA hosts its Gathering of Alberta Co-operatives, where they will share best practices and build connections among the communities.

“It’s bringing the family together,” Paul says, adding relationships and sharing lessons among the group is key to success.

“We really need to learn from each other and establish a base moving forward.”.

The meeting will be recorded with some of the sessions used for training other groups interested in starting a community investment co-op.

Peter Couchman, chief executive of the Plunkett Foundation, will also be presenting a keynote during the day, sharing how the United Kingdom’s co-operative movement has been able to solve social problems, and in doing so caught the attention of the federal government.

For more information on Unleashing Local Capital, see the ACCA website

Share
December​ 10, 2012
1:30pm Newfoundland, 1pm Atlantic, 12pm Eastern, 11am Central, 10am Mountain, 9am Pacific

This summer, the Canada Revenue Agency published CG-014 – Community Economic Development Activities and Charitable Registration Guidance.  This document replaces Guide RC4143, Registered Charities: Community Economic Development Programs and marks the first significant update since 1999.  This webinar will examine what has changed in the new guidance, what hasn’t, and what organizations that have or are considering applying for charitable status need to know.

In this session, representatives from the Charities Directorate of the Canada Revenue Agency will present the new guidance and a question and answer period will follow.  Participants who register early will be able to send questions in advance of the session.

 

[MORE INFO & REGISTRATION HERE]

Share

At the 2012 Social Finance Forum, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development Diane Finley announced a national call for concepts for social finance.

The Government will partner with organizations, businesses, and not-for-profit organizations around social innovation and social finance tools. Interested organizations are invited to submit their innovative ideas to help shape future social policy in Canada.

All interested individuals and organizations are invited to submit concepts for innovative solutions to issues facing Canadian communities. You do not need to submit a fully developed paper; simply “sketch out” your concept by completing the online questionnaire.

Ideas will be accepted until December 31, 2012.

For more information and to submit your concept >>

 


Background

(from the Government of Canada press release)

On November 8, 2012, Minister Finley announced that the Government is taking action to address social challenges through social finance initiatives, and launched a Call for Concepts for social finance. The Call for Concepts is designed to invite interested parties to submit innovative ideas; it is not an application process for federal funding.

Social Finance

Social finance is about mobilizing private capital to achieve social goals. Social finance creates opportunities both for investors to finance projects that benefit society and for community organizations to access new sources of funds to take great ideas to a new level. For example, individuals or organizations could invest in affordable housing projects or social enterprise such as a café that employs at-risk youth.

Social finance includes a new approach to investing, often referred to as “impact investing,” which the Canadian Task Force on Social Finance describes as, “actively placing capital in businesses and funds that generate social and/or environmental good and (at least) a nominal principal to the investor.” This means that investors can use their money to fund projects that will support social goals and expect some financial gains out of it.

The Government of Canada has already started to test new ways of developing and funding innovative solutions to complex social challenges through pilot projects. For example:

1. Community Innovation pilots will support projects that address economic and social issues in rural and northern communities. Through leveraged support, the Arctic Children and Youth Foundation delivers a project that helps Arctic children and youth obtain standards of education, opportunities and health equal to those of other Canadians.

2. A Community Partnerships pilot, Calgary’s Community Kitchen Program, mobilizes public and private funding to train volunteers to complete a simple needs assessment for clients and links them to appropriate community supports and address social exclusion.

3. Third Party Leadership pilots test whether grant-making organizations can leverage federal funding at a ratio of 1:3. For example, the Hamilton Foundation will leverage funds for a project to enhance community social and health services support to young, marginalized, low income first-time mothers.

Social Partnerships

Social partnerships are about building stronger, more effective government-community partnerships that present more sustainable, performance-based solutions to addressing social issues.

Economic Action Plan 2011 stated “the Government will take steps to complement community efforts by encouraging the development of government/community partnerships, enabling communities to tackle local challenges and testing new approaches to improve performance”. Economic Action Plan 2012 reiterated the Government’s intention to support momentum around social finance initiatives and further explore social finance tools for use in Canada.

The Minister of HRSDC established a Voluntary Advisory Council on Social Partnerships in 2011, composed of key individuals from the private and not-for-profit sectors, to provide advice on matters related to social partnerships and social finance in Canada.

Social Impact Bond (SIB)

A Social Impact Bond is one example of a social finance tool that is currently being explored or tested to address social challenges in many communities around the world and this tool is now being explored in Canada.

Essentially, a SIB is a contract between a government and an external organization(s), in which the government identifies desired social results and commits to pay the external organizations an agreed-upon amount of money if these results are achieved. External organizations involved in this arrangement may include charitable and/or for‑profit investors and service delivery organizations. Typically, investors provide the money to finance an organization to deliver a service. If the agreed-to results are achieved, investors may receive up to 100 percent of the original investment as well as a financial return. If the results are not achieved, the government does not pay.
 

Share

This is the text of a presentation given by CCEDNet Executive Director Michael Toye at the Forum pancanadien sur le développement économique en francophonie canadienne, November 1st 2012 in Gatineau, Québec.

 


I would like to start by thanking the organizers for the opportunity to present here today. 

As we heard this morning from Brigitte Gagné, Ethel Côté, and Nancy Neamtan, the co-op movement, community economic development and the social and solidarity economy are approaches that are well established across the Canadian Francophonie and have much to offer when it comes to creating sustainable and successful partnerships. 

Because CED and the social economy combine social and economic (and often environmental) goals, they naturally cross silos and are relevant to multiple sectors.  I believe these approaches reflect a growing recognition of the interconnectedness of economic, social and environmental concerns, and new tools such as environmental audits, impact investing, and social entrepreneurship reflect a both a desire by entrepreneurs to internalize these concerns as well as a growing market in social and environmental responsibility. 

CED addresses challenges that require collaboration between various levels of government, community agencies and the private sector.  This has been one of the biggest challenges in the development of these approaches, and has required much innovation and experimentation but also has led to valuable successes. 

I want to share with you four examples of that success from four areas, and the lessons they have taught us.

Read more >>

Share

Yvon Poirier, Chair of CCEDNet’s International Committee and co-author of the monthly International Newsletter on Sustainable Local Development, attended the Asia Solidarity Economy Forum in Indonesia earlier this month.  This is his report.


Report on ASEF Indonesia: Manado, October 1-3, 2012

Last year, at the 3rd Asia Solidarity Economy Forum in Kuala Lumpur, the Asia Solidarity Economy Council (ASEC) was set up as the Asian «network» of RIPESS. It was then decided to promote the idea of national networking, eventually with organising or developing national networks.  Some countries were identified such as Malaysia, Philippines, Nepal, and Indonesia.

The ASEF Indonesia meeting brought together different Indonesian organisations, researchers and academics, from different parts of the country. Alongside an international delegation of 15-20, an important knowledge sharing on concepts, practices and experiences at the grass roots filled the 3 day event.

One particular aspect of the meeting needs to be pointed out. About 2/3 of the 300 participants were university students, mainly form IBA (International Business Administration) of Sam Rutilangi University. Madano, North Salawesi province.. It was very inspiring, being a retired college teacher, to be able to speak to all these young people, who hold the future in their hands.

Miguel Hirota from Japan, now doing a Masters in Valencia University in Spain, wrote a detailed account of the forum (below). Thanks to Miguel for writing the report.

My proposal that to speak about the different concepts (social economy, solidarity economy, social enterprise, CED, etc.), was agreed upon and afterwards a formal invitation was sent.

The participation was possible because of support from COMMACT international, Chaired by David Thompson from Australia, also a member of the RIPESS Board.

Besides the plenaries and the workshops, many informal meetings were made, including with great Indonesian NGO’s.  The similarities with approaches to working in communities to improve the lives of the people are astounding.

Yvon Poirier
Report to CCEDNet and to COMMACT
October 15, 2012


Asia Solidarity Economy Forum Indonesia – 2012
Manado, Indonesia

Original posted on October 3, 2012

The Asian Solidarity Economy Forum 2012 took place from Mon, 01st to Wed, 03rd October at International Business Administration (IBA), Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, Northern Sulawesi, Indonesia. Hundreds of people from 17 countries (including Canada and 5 European countries) joined this event to share and learn different experiences that have been happening in different parts of this continent.

The day 1 (Mon, 01st October) began with the opening ceremony with a message from Dr. Sinyo Harry Sarundajang, Governor of North Sulawesi. After four Indonesian researchers commented about their visit to Germany thanks to the invitation from Konrad Adenauer Stiftung to learn how the social market economy is working there, Drs. Bambang Ismawan of Bina Swadaya (Indonesia) presented his perspective on solidarity economy. He mentioned the definition on solidarity economy given by Dr. Benjamin Quiñones Jr. (ASEC’s chairman, to be referred to later) as “economy developed by social enterprise”, showed the 3P (People, Planet and Profit) by Dr. Quiñones and underscored that 99.2% of businesses in Indonesia are small or micro enterprises. He also located the solidarity economy for those “economically active but poor,” excluding who are too old or too young and who are the poorest or feasible as conventional small businesses. After accentuating the importance of microcredit on enabling microenterprises’ existence, he explained that the best form of community institutions is self-reliance with “active membership”, “elected leaders”, “Economic + (social & educational)” activities and “democratically participative.” He said that such institutions are “vehicle for mutual learning and teaching, problem identification, decision-making, resource mobilization and communication with 3rd parties” and pointed out their features as “income generating orientation”, “open mindness” and “democratic”.

Then followed Dr. Benjamin Quiñones, Chairman of Asian Solidarity Economy Council (ASEC) from the Philippines who added further information on his definition of Social and Solidarity Economy (SSE). After defining it as something out of the public and private sector, he underscored “people’s participation in ownership & management of resources” and “profit sharing” as co-owners. He identified “solidarity”, “interdependence” and “people-to-people connectivity” as “edifying values” and showed the framework for evaluating SSE from the viewpoint of governance, ethical values, provided social development services, ecological conservation measures and sustainability. Prof. Dato Mohammad Yusof Kasim from University Utara, Malaysia underscored the importance of coops, Prof. Dr. Denison Jayasooria from University Kebangsaan, Malaysia explained that coops and microcredit are one of the key points on the civil society, along with CSR for sustainable development.

In the afternoon five workshops took place (Economic Security, Socially Responsible Governance, Enhanced Social Wellbeing, Healthy Climate and Environment and Edifying Value). Then another plenary took place and Prof. Dr. Paulus Kindangen from Sam Ratulangi University told that the competition by the capitalism has excluded many people, underscored the importance to empower that impoverished people and defined solidarity economy as “way out from the unfairness economic practice of capitalism” while trying not to abolish capitalism but to coexist with it. He mentioned the Article 33 of the Indonesian Constitution to tell that coops’ role is determined as “very important institution in creating or establishing economic democracy in Indonesia”, presented the word “gotong-royong” or “mapalus” as community mutual help, criticized the political intervention as “among the reasons of the cooperative failure”. Ir. Suhaedi from Bank of Indonesia talked about the financial inclusion as one of the biggest challenges of the Indonesian economy and Ms. Vivi George shared her experience of microcredit for women’s productive activities.

The day 2 (Tue, 02nd Oct) started with the presentation by Reiko Inoue, PARCIC Japan, about the hard task of community rebuilding in those coastline regions severely damaged by the tsunami in March 2011 which killed almost 20,000 people. She underlined social capital, market and management skill as most needed factors to develop solidarity economy. Then followed Prof. Wim Poli, professor at Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia told the need to go beyond the sympathy on building solidarity economy. Then Mr. Jay Lacsamana from the Foundation for a Sustainable Society (the Philippines) explained about this foundation, created as a result from the debt-for-development swap, arranged between the governments of the Philippines and the Switzerland, and told its commitment to the creation of social enterprises and to the local economy development. Then as a case study Mr. Ari Primatoro shared his experience to stimulate the farming in Punur Watershed, Central Java, explaining three achievements (self-help groups promotion, business development services, and market linkage). Mr. Gian Mansa shared his experience of bamboo handicrafts. And Ms. Jeanne Marie O. Bernardo from On Eagle’s Wings Foundation (the Philippines) narrated how she applied the five dimensions of social solidarity economy, namely “social mission-oriented or socially responsible governance”, “edifying value”, “social development services”, “ecological conservation” and “sustainability” onto the Free Range Chicken Supply Chain.

Then another session on finance started. Magnus Young from Impact Investment Exchange Asia (Singapore) explained the social investment opportunities in Asia, followed by this blogger (Miguel Yasuyuki Hirota, expert on social and complementary currencies)’s presentation on social and complementary currencies. Then three case studies were given: Bank Negara Indonesia and PNPM in Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian language), and the rice and onion supply chain APPEND, which improved farmers’ access to loans in better conditions. In the afternoon the ASEF market was held and different businesses, such as bioethanol, houses, handicrafts and tourism services, were shown, and two more cases were shown, namely an organic rice farming in North Sulawesi presented by Ir. Rachmat Mokodongan and an IT centre at Manado called Manadokota by Piet Hein Pusung, in both of which the importance of mapalus was highlighted. Last but not least, Hasan Tjandra from Sigma Global gave a short overview on the hardship in getting credits from the businessman’s viewpoint.

The last day (Wed, 03rd) began with three presentations on the concepts of solidarity economy: Herman Karamoy and Jullie J. Sondakh from the Sam Ratulangi university showed the definition of social enterprises as “one of the nonprofit organizations” and “a branch of non-profit-organization which mainly deliver goods and services mostly through charity funding and voluntarism” (Kam, 2010) and “the organization that apply business methods and practices in providing and improving benefit or value to the society”, locating them between charities and traditional businesses and underlining the importance of social enterprises’ accountability. Yvon Poirier from CCEDNET explained different, although similar, concepts in relation to solidarity economy, such as social economy, social enterprises and third sector, telling that such a diversity in so many parts of the world is a strength while putting such efforts together is a huge challenge. Shomi Kim from British Council in Korea shared the Global Changemaker, a project to involve the youth to the social change. Then professors at IBA shared their teaching experiences and another community training centre ILMU.

And in the final plenary four presentations were given: Benito Lopulalan and Dewi Hutabarat from AKSI-UI Foundation (Indonesia) presented some cases in which Indonesians are already collaborating with Malaysians or Timorese. Olivier Endelin and Florence Valle from Ekovivo (France) showed their project to help social enterprises get access to microcredits by increasing their visibility on the web. Ricarte B. Abejuela and Monique Sengkey pointed out the important fact that the agreement valid for the border islands between Indonesia and the Philippines is rather a hurdle than an incentive to stimulate the solidarity economy in this region as it limits international trades between these two countries. And finally Ibana The from IBA showed their website as a portal site to sell goods made by solidarity economy players in Asia. And on the closing ceremony some IBA students were rewarded for their excellent social enterprise projects.

As this forum was hosted by a business school, it has its own advantages and disadvantages. As advantage I should underline their expertise in business management, marketing and other related skills. And honestly speaking, I was highly impressed by IBA students’ high English proficiency, something quite uncommon in Indonesia.

But at the same time this forum showed some challenges for the future of solidarity economy in Asia, especially in the host country Indonesia: first of all, this forum was rather centred on social enterprises while not enough attention was paid to cooperativism, self-management and these businesses’ relationship with social movements. From my viewpoint, quite influenced by Latin American experiences, the middle class’ role in the solidarity economy, especially in terms of poverty reduction, would be rather to help the poor set up and manage their own coops than set up social enterprises, but it is also important that Asia has complete different historic precedents and, given the fact that many social enterprises have evolved from what used to be charity projects, it’s necessary to respect all the achievements Asians have done so far.

Another point is the limited use of Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian language) in the conference, which should have kept a huge number of ordinary Indonesians away from this precious event. As solidarity economy is for ordinary people, it’s essential that it should be given in a way ordinary people can understand, and it would be helpful if simultaneous interpretation between English and Bahasa were available.

Share