In November, 32 CCEDNet-MB members came together to plan the Network’s policy actions for 2013. CCEDNet’s annual Policy Summit provides an opportunity for members to discuss, debate, learn, and vote on the Network’s policy-related activities for the coming year. This year, eight new resolutions were brought forward, and all of which were passed unanimously. Based on our members direction, CCEDNet will pursue a policy mandate that includes such topics as: community owned wind power, child care, accessibility rights legislation, social enterprise development, affordable and social housing, co-op housing. 

[download our 2013 policy resolution package]

Advancing these policies:

This package now becomes a tool for all of us to use in advancing our collective policy agenda with policy makers. We look forward to the opportunity to collaborate with you in meeting our shared objectives. Some of you have already identified which resolutions you would like to help advance. Those of you who have not yet had an opportunity to do this, please complete this single question survey. Don’t forget to ask your staff team if they would like to be involved as well.

Teaching these Issues:

These resolutions also become an educational resource and many of you have indicated an interest in having CCEDNet Manitoba staff present these policies to the staff and board members of your organization. Please contact me directly to schedule a policy presentation.

Accessing the Package:

We have mailed this package to all members, and it is always available on our website here where you can view each resolutions individually or download the complete 2013 policy resolution package as a pdf.
 

 

Share

CCEDNet’s Board is pleased to announce that Yvon Poirier has been named Director for a term ending at the 2013 Annual General Meeting. 

Yvon has a long history of involvement in the labour and social movements in Québec and Canada.  He was founding President of the Corporation de développement économique communautaire de Québec in 1994, and member of the organizing committee of the Global Meetings on Community Economic Development in Sherbrooke, Québec in 1998.  Since November 2003, he has co-edited a monthly international e-newsletter on local development that is published in four languages.  He has been a CCEDNet member since 2003, involved in the International Subcommittee from 2003 to 2007, and President of CCEDNet’s International Committee since it was created in 2007.  He is co-author with Emily Kawano of Visions Related to Building the Solidarity Economy and Related Alternatives in North America.  He represents the CDÉC de Québec in CCEDNet.

Learn more about Yvon and other Board members >>

Board membership is open to all CCEDNet members, with at-large Director positions elected each year.  If you are interested in joining the Board, contact Michael Toye or watch for this year’s Board nomination information, which will be sent to members in February. 

Share

Attending WUSC International Forum 2012 – Youth Leading Change
A Canadian Connection at an International Level

Submitted by: Sandra Badcock, Co-Chair, Emerging Leaders

Attending an international forum is always an exciting adventure. You have no idea who you will meet, what you will learn, and what the conference will mean for you and your organization. The World University of Service Canada Forum 2012 delivered on all the requirements for a fantastic conference. As I attended as an invited guest, I found I got to really learn about World University Service of Canada (WUSC) and Uniterra and network with whomever I was lucky to sit next to during lunch.

The conference focused on three key messages: Turn Up the Volume – Youth Voices for Social Change, Show Us the Money! Economic Opportunities for Youth, and Everyday Global Citizenship. Each theme included a plenary session and concurrent workshops for your personal development. I myself found every workshop I attended interesting, and relatable. Learning about education and training programs in South Sudan reminded me of programs in St. John’s, Newfoundland that have been created for low-income individuals. Obviously, each program would be catered to the culture in which they were taught, but the basic principles of encouraging men and women to join the education program, to learn foundational skills needed in the workforce, and then learn specific skills in a trade which would provide them with job opportunities, are common in any employment and education program.

I found myself intrigued with everything presented, and taking notes to share with my colleagues who work in employment and education in St. John’s. Who would have thought that South Sudan implements a program almost exactly like those running across Canada? At that moment in the conference, I realized that anyone working in social or community economic development, with youth, adults or seniors, could relate to international work. Canadians could help network, share their ideas and help an international movement, even while staying here in Canada. While the conference was catered toward university students, I definitely felt that my work, my experience and my knowledge could be shared with attendees. By the end of the conference, I not only felt that I could contribute my knowledge, but that I wanted to become more involved with this international movement.

At the end of the conference, after wonderful concurrent workshops and a fantastic Gala and Awards Ceremony, I had the opportunity to sit down with some members of Uniterra and a representative from Ghana, Mohammed. We discussed the Canadian Community Economic Development Network and Emerging Leaders (a Youth Committee in CCEDNet). Throughout our conversation, I was able to explain the benefits of a network, share information, resources and contacts, and make a friendship. By the end of the conference, after three days of learning and wanting to become more involved with WUSC and Uniterra, I had the opportunity to sit with someone one-on-one to help make that happen! How exciting!

At the end of the day, feeling a Canadian connection at an International level was the best feeling I could have, and knowing that my knowledge and experience could be shared with those in Africa, was truly rewarding.

Share

By Camille Jensen.  Republished from Axiom News

We first met Enterprising Non Profits team manager David LePage more than three years ago as a presenter at the third Canadian Conference on Social Enterprise.

At that time, ENP worked only in Vancouver and Toronto. Now, the organization that equips nonprofits with business skills to create succesful social enterprises has expanded across the country, replicating the model in Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia. Next year, Calgary will host the Social Enterprise World Forum.

Axiom News was curious to learn what’s behind this growth, and what can be done to foster more social enterprise development in the next 10 years.

What better person to give us this insight than David, who is a member of the Social Enterprise Council of Canada and the BC Advisory Council on Social Entrepreneurship. Here’s the Q&A:

ENP team manager David LePage

David, in your opinion, what’s the most exciting thing happening in Canada’s social enterprise scene?
What’s fascinating to me right now is that there’s been a significant shift in the last two years in all three levels of the groups we work with.

We’re starting to see much more maturity in the nonprofit and the social enterprises, they’re much more about business and much more starting to understand this isn’t just a way to find more money to do what they’ve always done. It’s more about an actual cultural shift to looking at how do you use a business model that is self-sustaining in the most part, or contributes to what we’re doing, and achieves our mission at the same time? So, we’re seeing maturity in the whole nonprofit sector and the social enterprise sector.

In government, we’ve seen some big innovations in the last three years, especially at the provincial level. Nova Scotia is supporting ENP, and Nova Scotia just introduced hybrid legislation.

Ontario is still trying to figure out how do you use procurement to address poverty issues. Ontario just appointed a special advisor (Helen Burstyn) to the minister of finance on social enterprise.

Manitoba just announced its support for ENP and social enterprise and they give tax credits.

B.C. has the 11 recommendations coming out of the premier’s Advisory Council of Social Entrepreneurship that they’re actually working on implementing.

Three years ago, none of these governments were in that space.

You’ve got the federal government  supporting this sector with Human Resources Development Canada asking what are the ideas out there in social finance. Obviously looking for what’s the space that they can be working on, that wasn’t part of their language three or four years ago.

So, on the government side we’re seeing this shift, and then on the private sector side we’re starting to see more and more companies looking at moving CSR as being out there as something we do as philanthropy into their daily operations.

So that means companies like KPMG looking at their procurement, and instead of at the end of year doing philanthropic gifts, saying we buy catering, we buy printing, we use courier services. So, KPMG uses A-way Express couriers in Toronto, they use Phoenix Print Shop and Potluck and other social enterprise caterers here in Vancouver.

So, we’re seeing private sector moving into this space, government moving into this space and you see the nonprofit sector maturing in this space, so I think that to me is quite fascinating.

It is amazing, what do you think is behind it?
I think more and more people are realizing that mission and market are not oxymorons.  I think what’s fascinating is the younger people I meet, they’re not worried about the corporate structure, they’re just interested in how do I do a business that does good?

I think there is a shift in how we’re viewing business. It’s no longer business on one side of the divide and it’s all black and white, and on the other side it’s charity, and it’s all black and white. We’re actually seeing that blend of mission and market. I think as more people see success, government see’s success, nonprofits see success, than we all start to go there.

Based on the momentum you’re seeing now in just three years what do you think could happen in 10 years?
I think in 10 years we could have quite a phenomenal shift if people can get through some of the cultural barriers, and I think that’s the biggest problem. When I refer to the cultural barriers that’s the behavioural things because everything else is in place.

It’s not much different than the environmental movement, which shifted people’s behaviour over time. When you had a major purchaser of forest goods saying we’re only going to buy wood that comes from sustainable forests, all of a sudden the forest companies start to say we don’t have a market unless we do sustainable forestry.

As we see more of the demand side, when governments start to say we’re not going to purchase anything unless it has a Community Benefit Agreement or a social component, social enterprise is going to have to be more competitive in service delivery and private sector businesses are going to have to ask how to do that? For example, how do we hire people with disabilities.

So, that’s using market mechanisms to change behaviour, and I think in 10 years if we can keep on a good trajectory as we are now, we will see a really healthy social enterprise system, we’ll see business very much engaged in a blended-value procurement model, and I think we will see governments playing a different role, more of a facilitator and a convener than a funder. Because we know government’s role has to shift. If we can shift it in a positive way that would be great.

Are there any sectors where you see a lot of potential for social enterprise?
I don’t see a sector where there isn’t potential, especially in a lot of rural communities where people are retiring who are small business owners. Their sons and daughters have left, so it’s not going to be a family business, but it could be an essential business, it could be a hardware store or a grocery store.

Mission Possible is a social enterprise that employs residents from Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside to provide property maintenance services.

In Northern B.C., an aboriginal band didn’t have a gas station or a retail store so they set up a grocery store with two gas pumps — huge success.

If there’s a community need, whether its employment that’s missing, or arts and culture, or whether its retail, social enterprise is able to go in. In Nelson right now the movie theatre closed. The city owns the building, and there is a nonprofit group negotiating with the city so they can reopen the theatre in Nelson because that’s a community need and it’s not something necessarily that some business person is going to come along and say ‘what a great opportunity.”

For community events and community cultural events, it’s important, so the community can make it work in a social enterprise model, because they’re not just being driven by having to create profit. If they break even that would be great, but they will be adding a huge component to helping Nelson be a healthier community in terms of art and culture.

You’ve mentioned in a past interview that social enterprise is a means, not an end. What should be our ultimate goal, and how could social enterprise be part of that?
I think if our ultimate goal is creating healthy communities, then we say what’s the best role in that for the private sector, what’s the best role for government, and where does social enterprise fit in there?

Then you’re not looking at just the business model, but you’re looking at the social impact created by that business model. So you could have four thrift stores and one could be training new immigrants, another could be employing people with disabilities, another one could be making money hand over fist to support emergency services. Another one could be there to make sure there is clothing and household goods available to support low-income families.

It’s the same business, but you change the social purpose and you change how you do that business. So, the objective is not the business, the objective is the social impact.

That’s why we always say social enterprise is a verb. Everyone wants to define it, everyone wants to put it in a little box, there is no little box called social enterprise. There is no definition of social enterprise. Social enterprise is the activity of using business to create social value.

If we look at it that way, then it’s not just in food or employment or arts, it’s in any sector doing anything.

When someone says to me that they want to start a social enterprise, I always say why? It’s the why question, not the what question.

We can get lost arguing and trying to define social enterprise. But if we ask why, and if for example, it’s to create cultural activity in Nelson, than we have the impact defined. Now we can ask what’s the business to get that done?

This interview has been edited and condensed.

David LePage is the team manager at Enterprising Non-Profits (ENP), which supports the development and growth of social enterprises. 

David has been blending practice and policy in the non-profit arena for over 35 years. His community development work has been in inner cities, and remote communities, diverse cultural communities, while serving  in multiple roles, from board, manager, staff, and funder.

David is a member of the Social Enterprise Council of Canada (SECC), the Policy Council of the Canadian Community Economic Development Network (CCEDNet), the Social Enterprise World Forum  Collaboration, the Board of the Social Enterprise Alliance (North America) and the BC-based Social Impact Partners.

Share

Le Fonds de subventions d’éducation financière TD a été lancé le 31 mai 2010 et a accepté sa première série de demandes le 31 juillet 2010. Depuis, le Fonds a engagé 5 millions de dollars dans 67 projets. Comme prévu à sa création, le mandat de donateur du Fonds se terminera en décembre 2015.

Afin d’aider les candidats potentiels, cet avis décrit les dernières dates limites pour le dépôt des demandes, les affectations des subventions associées à ces dates et plusieurs points opérationnels clés liés à la planification des demandes.

Dates limites de dépôt des demandes

Le Fonds effectuera cinq (5) autres appels à candidatures en 2013. Les dernières dates limites seront :

  • Le 31 janvier 2013
  • Le 16 mai 2013
  • Le 19 septembre 2013
  • Le 30 janvier 2014
  • Le 17 avril 2014

Financement

Approximativement 5 millions de dollars seront répartis sur les 5 dernières séries du Fonds aux projets d’éducation financière offerts par les organisations caritatives et communautaires partout au Canada. Bien que ce financement soit équivalent à 1 million de dollars par série, le Fonds continuera à attribuer l’argent en fonction de la qualité des applications dans chacune des séries. De ce fait, certaines séries pourront recevoir plus ou moins de financement selon la qualité des propositions reçues. Le Fonds peut également décider de consacrer une plus grande portion des 5 millions de dollars sur les séries de 2013, afin d’assurer que le financement soit entièrement attribué avant la clôture du Fonds.

Planifier une demande au Fonds

1.        À compter de mai 2013, le Fonds commencera à réduire la durée maximum de 2 ans des projets pour permettre aux organismes de compléter leurs programmes, soumettre leurs rapports finaux et recevoir le paiement complet avant la dernière date limite de décembre 2015. Les candidats potentiels devraient utiliser le tableau ci-dessous comme guide pour être sûrs que leurs requêtes répondent aux exigences et surtout à la dernière date de terminaison des projets.

2.        Comme pour les séries de demandes passées, le Fonds encourage les initiatives ambitieuses qui contribuent à la communauté et/ou au domaine de l’éducation financière. Lors du processus, les requérants n’ont pas d’intérêt à demander un petit montant. L’évaluation du Fonds met l’accent sur le contenu du projet, incluant un budget sensible, et n’évalue pas les projets en fonction du montant de financement demandé.

Les requérants qui présentent des entreprises ambitieuses ou complexes peuvent vouloir considérer le financement de 300 000 $ du Fonds pour demandes coordonnées. Voir « Portée des subventions » dans les Lignes directrices du Fonds.

Rétroaction pour renforcer les demandes

Les descriptions de projet doivent cibler les activités du projet, pas les visions globales, thèses vastes, préoccupations liées à la promotion, etc., de l’organisme. Une description claire des objectifs, activités, éléments réalisables et dates limites est vitale à la compréhension des activités et de l’approche de la demande.

Les projets qui proposent des ateliers ou d’autres activités quantifiables doivent s’assurer de donner les mesures adéquates du rendement. Toute information concernant la durée, la fréquence, les cycles, la taille des cohortes, etc., est essentielle pour déterminer si le montant de la subvention, la description de projet et le budget forment un tout intelligible.

Les budgets doivent inclure suffisamment d’éléments, ainsi que les hypothèses sur lesquelles reposent les attributions, pour que le Fonds comprenne comment la subvention sera dépensée. De même, la correspondance entre le budget et la description du projet doit être très claire.

L’information sur le groupe client doit être explicite. La description du projet doit préciser clairement comment le contenu et la méthodologie correspondent aux besoins, aptitudes, etc., du groupe client.

La définition d’éducation financière du Fonds signifie que les projets centrés sur la formation doivent aider à bâtir les connaissances et les compétences des personnes, pas simplement élever leur niveau de conscience. Les projets qui proposent des cours de très courte durée (par ex. 1 h 30) ne répondent pas aux exigences du Fonds.

Le nombre de clients atteints, surtout en rapport au montant de la subvention accordée, est une considération de financement importante. Le Fonds évalue le groupe client et ses circonstances, le budget et les activités proposées, pour déterminer si l’atteinte est raisonnable. Par exemple, atteindre 20 personnes sur 18 mois avec un financement de 80 000 $ ne serait pas considéré raisonnable ou compétitif.

Note : Une rétroaction sur les demandes refusées est disponible.

Pour plus d’information, voir le site du Fonds de subventions d’éducation financière TD.

Share

The holiday season is also a time to help build fairer, more sustainable local economies.  Here are a few examples of CCEDNet members and local initiatives across the country who are creating opportunities for everyone to share in the joy.


CCEDNet Board member Carol Madsen of Tradeworks Training Society in Vancouver was on Global television explaining how their Women’s Workshop social enterprise makes beautiful Christmas ornaments while providing trades training for women in the Downtown East Side and using recycled wood. 

Watch the interview >>


Manitoba’s Community Enterprise Development Tax Credit is another way individuals can invest in community enterprises that are revitalizing neighbourhoods and creating a more sustainable and equitable local economy.  Businesses currently looking for investment through this tax credit include the Peg City Car Co-op, Neechi Commons, and Pollock’s Hardware


Of course, shopping at local, independent businesses is an important way to strengthen local economies.  The folks at Local First Toronto have prepared a poster with 12 Reasons to Give the Gift of Local This Holiday Season
 


You can also make a donation to the work of CCEDNet members around the world, such as CÉCI’s projects on food security and economic development of women, and Crossroads International’s initaitives empowering women and girls to control their own lives and providing skills and training to increase their power to earn an income. 
 


The Chantier de l’économie sociale proposes a wide range of products and services from social economy enterprises to support solidarity purchasing for Christmas. 


The Board and staff of CCEDNet wish you a very happy holiday season and all the best for the new year.

Share

The TD Financial Literacy Grant Fund was launched on May 31, 2010 and took in its first round of applications on July 31, 2010. Since that time, the Fund has committed approximately $5 million to 67 projects. As envisioned at its inception, the Fund’s mandate as a grantor will end in December 2015.

In order to support potential applicants, this notice describes the remaining application deadlines, the funding allocations associated with the deadlines, and several key operational matters related to application planning.

Application Deadlines

The Fund will conduct five more calls for applications, starting in 2013. The remaining application deadlines will be:

  • January 31, 2013
  • May 16, 2013
  • September 19, 2013
  • January 30, 2014
  • April 17, 2014

Funding

Approximately $5 million will be allocated over the 5 remaining rounds of the Fund, to financial literacy projects proposed by charitable and community organizations from across Canada. While this funding is equivalent to $1 million per round, the Fund will continue to allocate monies according to the quality of applications in any given round. Consequently, some rounds may see more or less funding committed, depending on the quality of proposals received. In addition, the Fund may choose to concentrate a larger proportion of the $5 million in the 2013 rounds, in order to ensure that funding is entirely allocated prior to the closure of the Fund.

Planning an Application to the Fund

1.        Beginning in May 2013, the Fund will begin to reduce the 2-year duration limit of projects to ensure that they complete activities, submit final reports, and receive final payments before the December 2015 deadline. Potential applicants should use the table below as a guide to ensure any future applications comply with requirements, especially the Projects’ Latest Completion Date.

2.        As with past application rounds, the Fund encourages ambitious projects that make contributions to the community and/or the field of financial literacy. For applicants, there is no advantage in the application process in requesting a small grant amount. The Fund’s assessment focuses on the content of the project, including a sensible budget, and does not weight projects according to the amount of the requested grant.

Applicants proposing far-reaching or complex undertakings may wish to consider the Fund’s $300,000 grant for coordinated applications. See “Scope of Grants” in the Fund’s Guidelines.

Feedback to Strengthen Applications

Project descriptions should focus on the project’s activities, not the organization’s general views, broad theses, advocacy concerns, etc. A clear outline of the project’s objectives, activities, deliverables, and timelines is critical to understanding a proposal’s activities and approach.

Projects that deliver workshops or other quantifiable activities should ensure that appropriate performance metrics are provided. Information related to duration, frequency, cycles, cohort size, and so forth is essential to determine if the grant amount, project description, and budget make sense as a whole.

Budgets need to include sufficient line items, and the assumptions behind allocations, for the Fund to understand how the grant will be spent. As well, there should be a very clear correspondence between the budget and the project description.

Information on the client group should be explicit. The project description should make clear how the content and methodology fit with the client group’s needs, aptitudes, etc.

The Fund’s definition of financial literacy means that training-focused projects must help to build knowledge and skills, not just raise awareness. Projects that propose courses of very short duration (e.g. 1.5 hours) do not meet the Fund’s requirements.

The number of clients reached, especially with respect to the requested grant amount, is an important funding consideration. The Fund considers the client group and its circumstances, the budget, and the proposed activities to determine if the reach is reasonable. For example, reaching 20 people over 18 months with a grant of $80,000 would not be considered reasonable, or competitive.

Please note: Feedback on unsuccessful applications is available. 

For more information, see the TD Financial Literacy Grant Fund website.

Share

 

CCEDNet – Manitoba urges City of Brandon to address affordable housing
 
We know that access to affordable housing is a necessary foundation for complete communities and stable families. We also know that Manitoba’s 1% rental vacancy rate is the lowest in the country, and that 33% of renters live in core need housing. To address this problem, the Canadian CED Network – Manitoba has submitted a letter to the mayor and council of Brandon to ensure that a robust housing strategy is included in the city’s upcoming growth plan, Brandon’s Roadmap for Growth 2014.
 
Acting on our member-adopted policy resolutions (2012.5 and 2012.7) on housing, CCEDNet urged the City of Brandon to use its newly adopted Affordable Housing First Policy to prioritize the development of new affordable and rental housing on surplus lands. CCEDNet also encouraged the City to use all of the powers within their jurisdiction (ie. inclusionary zoning bylaws, increased density, or the expansion of tax increment financing) to increase and preserve access to affordable and social rental housing in Brandon. 
 
We will be following the City’s progress on housing, and we look forward to opportunities to work with them and other municipalities to address this province’s critical affordable housing shortage.

[READ THE LETTER]

Share

Extra! Extra! The CCEDNet-Ontario’s newsletter for December 2012 are now available:

[CLICK HERE]

Share

On November 28, the Government of Nova Scotia introduced the Community Interest Companies Act, which will allow businesses formed under the Companies Act to be designated as community interest companies. They will have characteristics of both businesses and non-profits, combining entrepreneurship with a social purpose.

“With this act, the government is helping Nova Scotia respond to 21st-century opportunities and trends,” said Mr. MacDonell. “We are making it easier for Nova Scotians to start businesses that can benefit the economy and create employment, while contributing to a social good.

“Social entrepreneurism is a global trend that our government is paying close attention to and is committed to growing in Nova Scotia.”

Social enterprises are businesses whose primary purpose is the common good. They use business practices to advance social, environmental or community goals. Examples may include farmers’ markets, used clothing banks, community-owned wind farms and businesses run by charitable organizations. They often have a buy local focus and are gaining momentum worldwide as people seek to create, and support businesses, that contribute to the common good.

“Nova Scotia is a national leader in the development of community and social enterprise,” said David Upton, president, Atlantic Council for Community and Social Enterprise.

“The Community Interest Companies legislation is another tool that empowers communities to undertake initiatives that meet their needs. It will enable new types of partnerships and will allow community organizations to access additional sources of capital without eliminating any of the existing sources.”

Read more from the Government of Nova Scotia website >>

Overview by Miller Thompson’s Charities and Not-for-profit group >>

Share
At the December 5, 2012 General Issues Committee meeting of the City of Hamilton, the Planning and Economic Development Department proposed a 3-year CED pilot project. 

After research and consultation with experts in the community and other senior staff, City of Hamilton Economic Development staff concluded that a pilot project for a Community Based Economic Development Strategy could be implemented for a three year term. If this pilot proves successful and achieves results satisfactory to Council, then the program could be continued and/or expanded and included as a component of the next version of the City of Hamilton’s Five Year Economic Development Strategy that will commence formulation in 2015.

In other large Canadian cities, CED activity exists and it is often led by community organizations with a range of approaches including micro-loans, “buy local” campaigns, support for social enterprise and access to mentors for entrepreneurs. A trend seems to be emerging to include the principles of CED as part of municipal economic development strategies. For example, Edmonton City Council has indicated that CED is a priority initiative and, as such, they are hiring staff to support this direction.

Download the document >>

You can also read the Hamilton Community Legal Clinic’s presentation to the General Issues Committee meeting, supporting the report, including ‘pro-poor’ or ‘poverty reduction’ economic development strategies.   

Share

HRSDC Canada will be hosting a series of teleconferences on the national Call for Concepts for Social Finance. The teleconferences will be designed as question and answer sessions to inform participants about the concept of social finance, as well as the Government’s social finance initiatives, including the Call for Concepts. The Call for Concepts process ends on December 31, 2012. 
 
HRSDC is hosting a series of calls in time zones across the country on the following dates:
  • Western Canada:  Thursday, December 6, 2012 at 1:00p.m. – 2:00p.m. Eastern Time.
  • Eastern Canada:  Monday, December 10, 2012, at 1:00p.m. – 2:00p.m. Eastern Time.
  • Quebec:  Tuesday, December 11, 2012, at 10:00a.m. – 11:00a.m. Eastern Time.
  • Ontario:  Tuesday, December 11, 2012, at 1:00p.m. – 2:00p.m. Eastern Time.
To participate please call:
Toll-free number:  1-877-413-4781
National Capital Region: 613-960-7510
ID: 8326698

About the Social Finance Call for Concepts

The Government will partner with organizations, businesses, and not-for-profit organizations around social innovation and social finance tools. Interested organizations are invited to submit their innovative ideas to help shape future social policy in Canada.
 
All interested individuals and organizations are invited to submit concepts for innovative solutions to issues facing Canadian communities. You do not need to submit a fully developed paper; simply “sketch out” your concept by completing the online questionnaire.
 
 

For More Information

 
Share